Crooked (2006)

Wonderful character development!

Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

The film makes a home in your brain and the only cure is to see it again.

The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

It took me a while to finally watch this one, and although it wasn't the greatest film ever made(and I wasn't expecting it to be),I enjoyed it. Don "The Dragon" Wilson and Olivier Gruner have both done far better films than Soft Target A.K.A Crooked, but then they've also done far worse. Soft Target/Crooked falls below the level of their best films, but it manages to be a fairly diverting exercise in guerrilla filmmaking, and has it's share of cool moments. It's cool, for instance, to see Gruner and Wilson fighting side by side in this one, and cult favorites Fred "The Hammer" Williamson, Gary Busey, and Martin Kove, also pop up along the way. Some have said that the cast weren't utilized to their full potential, but I was genuinely surprised that certain actors bit the dust so early on,and surprising moments in low budget genre flicks like this are a very nice change of pace. Gary Busey's limited scenes also worked to the film's advantage. Busey comes off far better here then in many of other films where giving him extended screen time often worked to the detriment of the film. This time out Gary is limited, kept mostly on point, and actually used effectively. Wilson and Gruner both do their best with what they have to work with here. The plot is far from groundbreaking (which is par for the course in these types of films), the whole things looks like it was shot quickly (which continuously reminds you that this is indeed a low rent affair), but the guerrilla filmmaking feel of it all is a nice antidote to massively bloated mega-productions with lots of glam, but little guts. This one may be the work of hacks, but it is the work of hacks with an appreciation for the artistry of hacking together low budget "B movie" action flicks,and I for one appreciate that. Throw in some boobs and what's not to love?Taken on it's own terms as a low budget bit of escapism, Soft Target/Crooked delivers a decent amount of B movie entertainment value. Not the greatest film made by either of it's stars, but not entirely bad. I'm glad I finally watched it, and will no doubt watch it again some rainy Sunday afternoon.

As others have been so negative, I will try to stress the positive sides. Not that there are many. After all I think the movie only worth 3/10. The reason I watched the movie until the end is the reasonably interesting plot. Sure, the director does his utter best to kill that too. Again he fails. Two cops, who dislike each other, have to protect a witness. One member of their homicide team is an informant for the mob leader of the town. The latter wants the witness to be killed and wants the money she knows about. Admit it: this does not sound too bad.Indeed, as a result there are a couple of nice scenes. I mean the the "good cop vs bad cop" trick played on the witness and the quarrels between the two.Being this not a B-movie, but a C-movie at best we cannot expect too much from acting. Fred Williamson did some blaxploitation police stuff in the 70's. It is quite revealing, that he actually is one of the better actors. Gary Busey never rose above D-level. We should be happy, we don't see him too much. But the others really did not annoy me too much. That is quite an achievement in a stupid movie like this.The main culprit is the script - or what was left from it by the director, if we are to believe Wcmartell. It is awful. My conclusion is, that the idea deserves a remake by a skilled director.

Wow... Luckyly i didn't put myself through watching the whole thing... It's probably the only thing good about this movie... You know that it stinks within a few minutes :) Bad generic cliché script...Bad acting.. Bad choreography in action scenes.. Also horribly badly cut... Gary Busey must be pretty desperate and ''has been'' to play in something like this... I just found out i have to write 10 lines to post a comment, but I've never had to write 10 lines on how bad a movie is before :) I wish there was a way to get fair quotes on movies.... Obviously it'll never happen.Go see the vote results :) 6 voted 10\10 obviously members of the crew.. i predict it'll go down to 3\10 in no time... Find something better to waste your time on.

Here's the screenplay as a PDF file - read and compare the the finished film.http://www.scriptsecrets.net/screenplays/target.pdfThe script was once under option by a studio-based producer who couldn't get their name actor to commit. After bouncing around town, they made this film from it. BACKSTORY ON THE STORY:SOFT TARGET is about a top secret hit-man who can get past police protection to assassinate witnesses against the mob. One person has seen the hit-man's face and lived - a woman. The reason why this hit-man can bypass police? He's a detective. So the police department grabs their two most trustworthy detectives to find the woman and take her *somewhere* (don't tell us where) and when the beeper goes off, take her to the grand jury to identify the hit-man. They pick a random motel and WHAM! they are attacked. So the big question becomes - who can you trust? And that's where my theme came from. Every character has a *story purpose* (like the chief of detectives or a minor assassin disguised as a hotel maid) but they also have a *theme purpose*, too - and that provides character and subtext.So here's how I came up with my characters... What traits make you *not* trust someone?Can you trust someone who never shows their emotions? Can you trust someone who turns everything into a joke? Can you trust someone who is more intelligent than you are? Can you trust someone who is really moody? Can you trust someone who is too slick? Can you trust someone who always agrees with you? Can you trust someone who has serious substance abuse problems? Can you trust someone who is...Each of these theme traits are great doorways into character. And they are ways to show the differences in character, ways that will pop up again and again in the script (because the story keeps putting characters in situations where they must trust each other to survive... and situations where they can't trust each other).Once I had the theme traits, I thought about what kind of person has these traits and how they came to have them. I created a backstory for the characters and that backstory had other character elements - say, some guy who was in the military where he learned how to go along to get along or some guy who was in an abusive home and learned to hide his emotions or some guy who... well, you get the idea. I came up with backstories that fit the theme traits and gave me other traits that define the character.Then I looked at how each character talked - everyone has a different vocabulary. Different pet phrases. Hey, some of these pet phrases may have something to do with theme! I was using theme to explore character *and* explore story *and* take a look at society (in a world where it's hard to find someone to trust, post 9/11).Next I looked at actions and reactions - everyone has a different method for solving problems or dealing with problems. Again, these are thematic, and also *show* character through actions.Then I looked at their world view - everyone sees the world through their past experiences.Then at the way they process information - everyone has a different type of "mental filing cabinet".I know my characters, they start talking to me in their own voices and I could see the world as they see it (rather than as I see it), and they all become individuals - their own persons.Now I had three dimensional characters who are helping to explore the theme - we're going to look at trust in our modern times and why we need to trust others instead of lock the doors to our lives and trust no one. Because the story for SOFT TARGET places the characters in a world where they really can't trust others... and they maybe can't even trust themselves (what if they *accidentally* gave information to a friend who ends up being the bad detective?) we can look at how hard it is to trust someone these days but how important it is to trust people... because we can't go it alone. We can't just isolate ourselves from the world and still have a life. If we're going to survive as a society we have to work together... and that means we have to trust people. Sometimes we have to trust strangers... and that's the point of the story.Then, they made some changes. Read the original script and tell me what you think. Did they improve it... or not?Bill