Night of the Living Dead 3D (2006)

Excellent, Without a doubt!!

everything you have heard about this movie is true.

Tells a fascinating and unsettling true story, and does so well, without pretending to have all the answers.

Blistering performances.

Brilliantly directed by Jeff Broadstreet and with a screenplay by the visionary George Romero himself, this features a magnificent utilization of 3D and the undead have never been more intensely depicted. This is nothing less than a truly majestic entry in the Dead Canon and no one who sees this will ever forget the haunting imagery of this film. The legendary Sid Haig gives a superb performance and the entire cast is uniformly excellent. This is not a remake but a re-imagining of the original groundbreaking masterpiece and it is a very lovely homage to that black and white landmark. Those who have studied the 1968 motion picture and hold that film sacred will find this 3D movie a stunning, incredibly exquisite tribute to mother ship film. The casual audience member will simply be astonished by the horror, the suspense, and overwhelming apocalyptic intensity that is Night of the Living Dead 3D.

This movie is not complete trash as most of the others have stated in many of the earlier reviews. This movie has many great features to observe and enjoy from a lower budget film aspect. First things first you can not go into this movie expecting a movie that owns up to a movie such as dawn of the dead remake. That remake was made with over double what these people where given to work with all together; so that should be your first sign that your not getting a dawn of the dead remake. Secondly, with the budget being considered you should understand that the 3-D moments may not be as crisp or as often as a movie given 30 million dollars to use equipment that is necessary.Next thing to be reminded of is that we are now in a different day and age when being a *donkey* is now considered funny. If a character is playing the stoner kid he is obviously going to get the roll of a dumb, slow, retard kid, that lost all his brain cells to the use of drugs. People laugh and thing that is great now and day and when the movies today do not contain such things as drinking, sex, partying, drug use, and nudity the audience grows bored more quickly and the movie suffers more because lets be the main thing horror fans want to view these days is all the things i just listed above. Which is where the word remake is okay for this movie. I myself would probably call this movie more of a remake update sort of film. My final characteristic that i think made this movie a 7 out of 10 is that this movie added a campy Friday the 13th element to the film itself and in my opinion it was much needed. It once again added that "zest", if you will, to the film that is so lack in the prior classic, at least that is my opinion.In closing, I am not saying this film is anywhere near as good as dawn of the dead remake but once again the budget difference was $27,250,000 million dollars. Yeah, that should say it all I shouldn't need to continue. Judge the movie the way it should be judged and not to Hollywood status.

i sort of knew by the cover that this would be crap, i watched 'my bloody valentine 3d', it was better, but i still thought that was crap too, the 3d like my bloody valentine was the only reason i bought this, living dead 3d didn't even get that right, at least my bloody valentine got the 3d right, living dead 3d seemed too dark in places, I felt sorry for the zombies, they seem pathetic, please be my friend types, got to the point where a young man pushes a joint toward the camera, instead of me saying, whoa thats coming toward me, all i saw was two joints, the 3d red and cyan are too far apart, so not much looks like its coming at you, its crap, the only selling point, the 3d, but thats crap too

This movie was absolutely terrible. Bad acting, bad special effects, ridiculous uninspired writing, truly an insult to legacy of Romero in every way.Not much more to be said, an embarrassing effort not even worthy of scifi channel status.Do yourself a favor and pass this weak effort by. I diddn't even want to finish it, but I did and I can honestly say it never gets any better.The only way to make this enjoyable would be to give it the Mystery Science Theater treatment, then it would be tolerable. No one in this movie was even slightly believable and had the combined acting depth of a puddle, INCLUDING their poster boy.