Home > Science Fiction >

Caged Heat 3000

Caged Heat 3000 (1995)

January. 01,1995
|
3.5
| Science Fiction

It's the year 3000 AD. The world's most dangerous women are banished to a remote asteroid 45 million light years from earth. Kira Murphy doesn't belong; wrongfully accused of a crime she did not commit, she's thrown in this interplanetary prison and left to her own defenses. But Kira's a fighter, and soon she finds herself in the middle of a female gang war; where everyone wants a piece of the action... and a piece of her! "Caged Heat 3000" takes the Women-in-Prison genre to a whole new level... and a whole new galaxy!

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Reviews

Console
1995/01/01

best movie i've ever seen.

More
Megamind
1995/01/02

To all those who have watched it: I hope you enjoyed it as much as I do.

More
Tayyab Torres
1995/01/03

Strong acting helps the film overcome an uncertain premise and create characters that hold our attention absolutely.

More
Scarlet
1995/01/04

The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

More
Uriah43
1995/01/05

This movie takes place in the future at a female penal colony with the arrival of a visiting dignitary who is humiliated due to a deadly altercation created by one of the prisoners named "Kira Murphy" (Lisa Boyle). As a result, she is subsequently tortured and sent to another section of the prison which is much more dangerous. That being the case, it isn't long before several of the inmates take an active interest in her--and they don't like the fact that she killed one of their friends. Now rather than reveal any more I will just say that this was imaginative woman-in-prison film due to the science-fiction backdrop and had the added benefit of a beautiful actress like Lisa Boyle (aka Cassandra Leigh) in the lead role. Unfortunately, that's about all the film had going for it as the acting wasn't very good and the multiple fight scenes needed serious improvement as well. In short, I have to say that this wasn't a very good movie and because of that I have rated it accordingly. Below Average.

More
Ahmed Khaled
1995/01/06

I have always wandered how could Ed Wood win some title like 'worst director ever". This s too ambitious. This movie makers can earn the title comfortably. Here you are in a sick world of nudity, rape, S&M and masturbation, and the problem is you don't care or give a damn. This flick has no intention but to show ample nudity, and to arouse sick thoughts in the minds of audience. Well.. It failed to do so !.. It's not funny.. It's not erotic.. It's not amusing... I have seen some porn flicks that deserve Academy awards when compared to this movie.Woman prison flicks are out dated and should be stopped. They have only one theme, and we know all keys of the game... I recommend U save your hard earned money and time. Watching the news on CNN can be far amusing...

More
HEFILM
1995/01/07

The director went back to production designing and if you watch his films you'll be glad he did. This is one of the worst of the Roger Corman produced films and there is some tough competition for that prize. This is one of those things where they just don't seem like they know how to make a movie of any sort.What should be a hose down in outerspace, can't manage anything that is entertaining, that looks like a movie, or even manages to hit the marks that are required for a women's prison film. Not a classy genre but...Sex appeal is low and production design, you'd think the director would at least get that right, is thread bare, more so than the actresses. A wasted opportunity and a waste of time on all levels.

More
Buck-27
1995/01/08

Although I haven't seen the prequels to Caged Heat 3000, I can guarantee that this film will arouse your artistic sensibility (among other things). The film opens with an artistic montage of tragic and violent images, and from there quickly spirals into a bombardment of silicon beauties. The fights were incredibly cheesy if you took the time to divert your attention from the ladies. There weren't any special effects worth mentioning, however the sets were well done considering the budget. Kudos to anyone who has the patience the count every single pair of breasts. Pausing and taking count will need to be done many times. My guess is that the 3000 was derived from the breast count. Bear in mind, that the film is not limited to just breasts... plenty of buttocks and female genitalia will fulfill a need in most people who are between girlfriends. I had just gone through a brutal divorce, and this movie had really hit the spot. For a $0.99 Albertson's Monday special, it beats a marriage counselor.

More