Home > Drama >

Who Killed Atlanta's Children?

Who Killed Atlanta's Children? (2000)

July. 16,2000
|
5.9
| Drama Crime TV Movie

From 1979 to 1981, 29 African-American males, mostly children, were either missing or found murdered in metro Atlanta. The cases plagued the city until 1982, when Wayne Wiiliams was convicted of the murders of two adult men. Authorities then considered the other cases closed. Some of the parents of the slain children were critical of the way the cases were handled and believed there was some sort of cover up. Nearly four years after the conviction of Williams, "Spin" magazine editor Ron Larson and reporter Pat Laughlin come to Atlanta in search of the truth.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Lawbolisted
2000/07/16

Powerful

More
FeistyUpper
2000/07/17

If you don't like this, we can't be friends.

More
Steineded
2000/07/18

How sad is this?

More
Yvonne Jodi
2000/07/19

Unshakable, witty and deeply felt, the film will be paying emotional dividends for a long, long time.

More
Jakealope
2000/07/20

The whole premise of the KKK plot behind the killings portrayed in this film is pure garbage. For one, even in the film, they acknowledge that the Mayor of Atlanta back then was black, so why would he want to suppress the news of this so called conspiracy? The film tries to explain this that anything short of a complete indictment of the KKK would make martyrs of the klansmen and/or start a race war is crap too. Even if the KKK was not directly indicted, a few of the white killers could have been arrested and tried and they may have later ratted on the KKK.Second, the killings stopped after the rightfully convicted killer was arrested. Another clue that the premise of this book and movie are bunk. the fact that no one ever saw one white man abduct any of those black kids should be cause to doubt this whole conspiracy.No slight against James Belushi, he is an okay actor but no star and Hines is the same. This is total B movie dreck aimed at a crackpot black audience who refuses to accept any responsibility for their own people's dismal lot. So there is a built in audience for this kind of dishonest dreck. Stone's "JFK" was a load of crap too, but at least that was an interesting well made movie.But just look at Mumia, another case involving a black killer, these sort of cases create conspiracies.

More
boobie1822
2000/07/21

My theory regarding the release of this movie leads me to believe that this film was originally made for theatrical release (at the end credits it states that this is a Motion Picture through Viacom) . The elements such was cinematography, excellent DP and camera angling is not typical for a made-for-TV. And now I remember that this was a Showtime release. I have my other thoughts that if this film were released theatrically, could you imagine the uproar from audience viewer ship? This film makes a powerful statement of what possibly may have been the fact that the Klan's involvement in the actual murders is highly likely. And I do not think that this is a "maybe" to tell you the truth. The fact that this probe and investigation was ever released by Spin Magazine tells me that there is a very high probability that the Klan was the main suspect into the murders. This film is excellent in that the use of documentation and eyewitness accounts from the officer involved in the investigation of the murders to the mothers and the state representative standing strong to bring the truth to the public. I was a child myself when this case was televised via media coverage. Even as a child, I could not tell you why I felt that something was not satisfactory in the apprehension of Wayne Williams.It was too neat and convenient, yet, I could not verbalize this supposition as a child. I never imagined, even at that point, that it could have been the Klan. However, as I watched this film, I was completely convinced that the Klan was absolutely involved in all of the murders. How frightening and historically sensible that it would be the Klan.Gregory Hines and James Belushi were terrific together as the reporters turned investigators as they unravel the secrets and the cover up behind one of the country's most scathing murder cases of the decade. I enjoyed their SINCERE comrade and chemistry. They were outstanding together and I would love to see them together again solving another case as detectives (if Mr. Hines were still living as he was multi-talented and emanated intelligence in every role he has every played. I will sorely miss him).It was genius to add Belushi to the casting because while he is mainly a comedic performer, he also demonstrates the ability to portray seriousness with fine comedic balance to lighten up a very disturbing and very heart-breaking true story. The producers couldn't have selected a better team and an overall powerful cast.This film is well worth watching and was delicately handled as this is a subject which continues to be very much a living reality in America. This hatred has got to stop because there is too much beauty and perfection while watching Caucasian and African-Americans work together in films. I love it and I love the chemistry as it brings a positive energy to any movie when the pairing is sincere and the performances are authentic.As Ebert says; Two Thumbs Up for this picture. It is frequently aired on Court TV (however) if you can stand the constant commercial interruptions. All in all, it is worth the watch.

More
TxMike
2000/07/22

I saw this on DVD, from our public library, titled "Echo of Murder (2000) (TV) (USA)". I went into it deliberately knowing nothing about the story, eager to see Gregory Hines and Jim Belushi. I was not disappointed. Hines, who died last year, did no dancing or singing here, yet proves again that he was one of our fine, mostly overlooked actors. Set in the mid-1980s, he is the boss, Belushi works for him at a national magazine. They go to Atlanta upon the urging by a black lady politician who believes there is more story than the investigation, closed 5 years earlier, of the murder of 25 to 50 black children in the 5 counties that makes up Atlanta. It is both a well-made movie, and an important piece of American history.SPOILERS, SPOILERS follow, read no further if you don't want any surprise spoiled. A young black man was convicted and sent to prison, authorities attached blame to him for all the children murdered, but an investigation into a possible Klan role was kept secret and all records destroyed just a short time after the investigation was 'closed', in violation of Atlanta records policy. One cop, however, had made copies of key documents first, and buried them for safety, eventually turning them over to the two reporters. There was some vague implication that Atlanta's first black mayor was involved in the suppression of information, to not tarnish his administration. There is a clear implication that a member of the Klan investigation team was in fact a Klan member, and his was the main role in suppressing the investigation, along with destroying records. There seemed to be strong evidence that the Klan was indeed on a mission to kill black children as a method of 'cleansing' their community. The movie ends with no firm conclusion, and that may upset many viewers. However, for me it was still a worthwhile viewing, to understand a bit better some of the impact of racism, which we all hope is fading into history. We're not there yet!

More
flimbuff
2000/07/23

A racially mixed pair of reporters start out to cover the Atlanta child murder cases and come to believe that a huge KKK conspiracy is involved in the killings and it was covered up by a combination of police bungling and politics. The story is almost believable yet it fails to recognize that the situation was such that American black activists were all over the case too and it would seem very likely that they would publicize such a conspiracy and not just let the matter rest as it has. The film is a little too simplistic in that sense and doesn't cover any extensive interviews with the defendant or examine why or if the murders continued after his apprehension. I could readily understand the political motives for covering up such an inflammatory conspiracy but it seems too far fetched to believe that such a coverup would have to involve so many people of different races and views that it just seems to implausable. Good effort by Hines and Belushi though.

More