Home > Adventure >

A High Wind in Jamaica

A High Wind in Jamaica (1965)

June. 16,1965
|
6.5
|
NR
| Adventure Drama Action

In 1870, a Jamaican colonial family sends its children to Britain for proper schooling, but their ship is taken over by pirates, who become fond of the kids.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Acensbart
1965/06/16

Excellent but underrated film

More
AnhartLinkin
1965/06/17

This story has more twists and turns than a second-rate soap opera.

More
KnotStronger
1965/06/18

This is a must-see and one of the best documentaries - and films - of this year.

More
Verity Robins
1965/06/19

Great movie. Not sure what people expected but I found it highly entertaining.

More
leoperu
1965/06/20

The film may seem uneven and confusing to the first-time viewer, "moving from inappropriate comedy to tragedy to whatever is in between", as Mr.Chabot puts it, but contrary to that reviewer's opinion I think that having adapted Richard Hughes' novel (which itself is a superb achievement, something special in the world literature canon) Mackendrick succeeded in preserving at least some of its key qualities and creating a highly satisfactory piece of cinematic life. The story is funny when funny things happen in it, and it's tragic when it comes to tragedy. What's in between is both psychologically compelling/interesting and cinematographically attractive. As for me, with every new viewing I like the film a bit more : a light, colourful adventure pic with strongly subversive undertones echoing Freud, Piaget, Frazer etc., climaxing in an unforgettable ending where even the otherwise tasteless song has its appropriate place. Well-known British writer Martin Amis in the role of little John.Compared to British edition (Eureka) the German one(Carol Media - a Fox port?)with both English and German subtitles has a brighter image, more into red (Eureka is rather greenish), slightly cut on both sides (and minutely horizontally stretched ?).

More
vlevensonnd-1
1965/06/21

I saw this movie as a child and it had made such an impact on me that I never forgot it, or the haunting theme song. I'd long since forgotten the title, so I was utterly thrilled when I happened to turn the AMC channel on and they were playing it - 30+ years after it was in theaters! It wasn't until after the two main actors passed away that this movie was FINALLY released to the public - around 40 years AFTER it was made. I do not know if it was due to some rights conflict, or that maybe they didn't want it released due to the original story that dealt with a very 'inappropriate relationship' between the child-character Emily, and the Captain. This relationship is displayed far more subtly in the movie, most likely to make it a bit more family-friendly, however, the book was far from being a family-friendly novel. The book and movie are thankfully and EXTREMELY different in demeanor and focus. The author's focus appeared to be more with a notion of an innate evil within children, where he presents them as being cunning, manipulative, knowledge-filled, demon-like creatures, rather then innocent-minded youths. A couple of examples of the differences in demeanor between the book and the movie; In the book, it is the Captains right-hand man, Zac, who takes the eldest dark-haired girl by brutal force and keeps her as his - uh - female. When she becomes a lifeless, emotionless shell, he simply throws her overboard into the sea. In the movie, it is the girl who takes notice to a crew member and no one is taken by force or repeatedly raped or thrown to the sharks. At the end of the movie, Emily is confused by what occurred on board with the battle they were involved with, where the other ships Captain was murdered in Captain Chavez's quarters, where Emily was. She very innocently, grievously, and mistakenly says something that sends her beloved Captain, and his crew, to the gallows. In the book, she did it on purpose with malicious intent. It's like two completely different stories.I would much rather watch this wonderful and exciting movie, then to ever again read the dark novel that this came from. The acting is completely superb, even among the children. I have watched it several times and I will again.

More
alana-dill
1965/06/22

This movie really does deserve a revival. Given the resurgence of interest in things piratical, it's about time.It's a bit like "Lord of the Flies" but I *hated* that movie. I prefer to have a little more faith in humanity. (Silly me.) I saw High Wind on TV sometime in the 70's, but missed part of it. Oh, for a VCR. Oh, for TiVo! Not as cute and ar-harhar as most pirate movies; it's more a study of human vicissitudes than a romp. Gangs at sea. But still: pirates. Stowaways. I mostly remember the harsh seaside light, intense suspense, creaking ropes and the sense of salty wind, and some serious but not too cute little girl observing (was this about a chicken or a dead man? I can't remember.) "He's got his head on backwards!" Coburn and Anthony Quinn are grizzled and fascinating. Quinn has to be one of the most amazing, versatile actors ever. Plus, what a *man*! purr. I'd just love to see it again and fill in the blanks.

More
moggy-4
1965/06/23

I first saw this film as a child, and was surprised that I remembered so much of it over 30 years later. It is an unusual story of children who end up on a pirate ship by a quirk, and their relationship with the pirates, who regard them as unlucky. Which turns out to be true, in an unforeseen way. Anthony Quinn, as pirate captain, is superb, as are all the cast, especially the actress playing Emily, the oldest child.Forget any preconceived ideas you might have about the plot. This is a haunting, unforgettable story.

More