Home > Drama >

The Hi-Lo Country

The Hi-Lo Country (1998)

December. 30,1998
|
6.1
|
R
| Drama Western Romance

An intimate story of the enduring bond of friendship between two hard-living men, set against a sweeping backdrop: the American West, post-World War II, in its twilight. Pete and Big Boy are masters of the prairie, but ultimately face trickier terrain: the human heart.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Hellen
1998/12/30

I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

More
Evengyny
1998/12/31

Thanks for the memories!

More
Matialth
1999/01/01

Good concept, poorly executed.

More
Philippa
1999/01/02

All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

More
Tilly Gokbudak
1999/01/03

I was surprised and disappointed to see this film only get a 6.0 in the database. I am giving it a 7 because Penelope Cruz, who I respect as an actress- amazing beauty aside- doesn't quite fit into this film. Otherwise, the directing from Stephen Frears, who has tried (it seems) as many genres as Howard Hawks, is solid. Billy Crudup, Patty Arquette and even Woody Harrelson (still want my $ back from NBK even though it's been a decade now!) is quite good in this. It is very hard to make Westerns these days, and I'm sure the box office from this film won't help. But, along with "Dead Man" and "Unforgiven," this film proves it can be done. Worth a look, especially for those of us ( a minority in my generation- GEN X) who still apprecaite the Western as a genre and as an art form.

More
Mort-31
1999/01/04

Utterly boring soft-western about a bunch of `real' cowboys on a `modern' farm after World War II. In some old black-and-white films I have problems telling the various female characters apart. In this movie, it's the men. Big Boy, Little Boy, Pete, Steve, now and then one of them dies, but nobody really cares. Sorry, this movie didn't keep me awake at all. I can't imagine that Sam Peckinpah would have been able to make a better movie out of a story of such poor interest.

More
Erin Baker
1999/01/05

I would never ask someone to not see a film based on my opinion. I think people see this movie, and then tell me how right I was...:)This movie would've been more bearable if it was cut in half. It was way too long, and with no good solid storyline, it was very boring. The characters didn't have any definition, so no matter how good the acting was, you didn't really care about them. The score was very repetitive and annoying, and sounded like it had a bit of the "Conspiracy Theory" score thrown into it.So! If you would kindly pass me a rock...

More
milf-2
1999/01/06

Great to see a new western and this one was particularly good to look at: capturing the flat, wide western country with all its beauty and natural dangers and contrasting it nicely with the badly-lit, cramped and emotionally charged interior spaces of its bars, farmsteads and honky-tonks. Outside there might be sun, drought, wind and snow, all largely visited at nature's whim; inside there's all sorts of very human dangers, including: infidelity, cheating, financial and legal corruption, and witchcraft - which can all be largely seen as a breaking down of loyalty and trust. War, the demands of the market-place and changing times in general, are shown to have bought a dislocation to the traditional rural certainties of conduct and order; the same forces splitting both the community at large and individual families.Ed Buscombe's masterly review in Sight and Sound articulated my own slight sense of disappointment with the film. He rightly saw that the character of Big Boy, as played by Woody Harrelson, fails to convince that he is worthy of the strength of love and loyalty that Pete and others feel for him. As Buscombe says, his antics too often subside into a charmless boorishness - contrast this say with Kristofferson's Billy the Kid for Peckinpah, whose behaviour is equally wild but we never doubt his basic goodness and accept the affection in which he is generally held.The film's recreation of the1940s was very nicely done: with terrific locations and just enough of the right artefacts to suggest the period, rather than an over-dressed museum tableau. The film cleverly slips between that contemporary world and an oppositional timelessness in the unchanging rhythm of the cowboy's life. I liked the way the film's characters acknowledge the anachronistic effort required to follow the cowboy life in 1940s post war USA: "I hear you're having an old fashioned cattle drive" Mona says to Pete, and earlier when Pete suggests to Jim Ed Love, the cattle baron, that "people still drive their cattle to the railhead" he replies "only in the movies".More than a nod then to Red River, with its fascination with the changing demands of the market place and the effects those changes bring to ranch and cowboy. At heart HiLo is not much more than a rather tacky melodrama but its still very watchable: its lovingly shot, it just about keeps the western mythology alive and it has some great songs. It also has good supporting performances from Billy Crudup (Pete), Patricia Arquette (Mona) and Rosaleen Linehan (Mrs Big Boy), in particular.

More