Home > Fantasy >

Vlad

Vlad (2004)

September. 10,2004
|
3.3
|
R
| Fantasy Horror Thriller

Death and spiritual torment stalk three American students visiting the Carpathian mountain homeland of Vlad Tepes.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Reviews

Suman Roberson
2004/09/10

It's a movie as timely as it is provocative and amazingly, for much of its running time, it is weirdly funny.

More
Mandeep Tyson
2004/09/11

The acting in this movie is really good.

More
Deanna
2004/09/12

There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.

More
Zandra
2004/09/13

The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.

More
jacobjohntaylor1
2004/09/14

This is one of the most underrated horror films of all time. 3.4 is just underrating it. I give it 10 out of 10. This is a Dracula sequel. Like most Dracula sequels it awesome. This is one of the scariest movie of all time. It has a great story line. It also has great acting. It also has great special effects. Dracula (March 1931) is better. Nosferatu (1922) is also better. Dracula (1992). If this movie does not scary you no movie will. This is better then Dracula (April 1931). It also a lot better then Nosferatu (1979) Dracula's daughter (1936) is better. Son of Dracula (1943) is better. This is better the Abbot and Costello meet Dracula. House of Frankenstein is better. House of Dracula is also better. See this movie is it one of the scariest movie you will ever see.

More
disdressed12
2004/09/15

i will be fair here and say that i didn't watch the whole movie.the reason is i found it way too slow and boring,plus it just looked too low budget.low budget isn't always a bad thing,when the rest of the movie is good.sometimes you don't even notice the budget.for me that is not the case with this movie.i have heard of some of the actors in this movie,and they've done some good work in the past.but in tis movie,it just seemed like no one wanted to be there.this is just my opinion and i could be wrong,but that's how i saw things.anyway,the bottom line is,from what i saw,this movie wasn't going anywhere fast.i give Vlad a 3/10

More
thoraj
2004/09/16

Tsk tsk Billy Zane! I am horrified by this flick and some of the comments it has gotten. Original storyline in some aspects but the filmmakers could have done much better if they had put any thought at all into it. I just can't believe that anyone would like this... the only positive things I can say is that the locations were nice. The actors were horrible and completely unbelievable. I love Brad Dourif and I know that he sometimes makes odd choices as to his work so I can't fault him or his performance but there is just not enough of him. But Billy Zane : what were you thinking? The role is not good and you didn't even give a decent performance! Don't see this film... rent anything else in fact. Anything, really, trust me on this. I am a huge fans of all vampire flicks and this one has the honor of being the worst one I have ever seen.

More
industrygeek
2004/09/17

I just saw this movie last night, cause it look interesting. An award-winning and critically acclaimed b-movie. It should work as a warning call, i know... Because if it won an award at some horror movie festival... and some critics liked it... there's a good chance it's really really pretentious! And what do you know? It was! Ha HA HAA! Some people say here on IMDb that it is an "intellegent vampire movie". This movie has the same problems most Asian horror movies has. Its too damn "smart" for its own good. And its also supposed to be romantic and sexy, because anyone with half a brain knows that the whole vampire mythology and Dracula is all about sex. But this was more like watching one of those Harlequin movies my mother likes. I'm not banging independent vampire flicks... but i've seen better ones... and worse... Vlad is better then say... way of the vampire. And in i'ts defense i can say that Hollywood hasn't put out a decent vampire movie in... well... i guess the early 70's. And yes i am counting the chick flick "bram stokers Dracula".Oh, and if they ever make a movie about Lenin, Billy Zane should play the lead! Anyway, don't rent or buy this... pick up a copy of "dracula 2001"... it's rubbish too... but you can always amuse yourself by staring at Jeri Ryans tits. Unless you're in to the whole goat boy look, then Vlad is the movie for you!

More