Home > Drama >

The House of the Seven Gables

The House of the Seven Gables (1940)

April. 12,1940
|
7
|
NR
| Drama Thriller

In 1828, the bankrupt Pyncheon family fight over Seven Gables, the ancestral mansion. To obtain the house, Jaffrey Pyncheon obtains his brother Clifford's false conviction for murder. Hepzibah, Clifford's sweet fiancée, patiently waits twenty years for his release, whereupon Clifford and his former cellmate, abolitionist Matthew, have a certain scheme in mind.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Infamousta
1940/04/12

brilliant actors, brilliant editing

More
Beanbioca
1940/04/13

As Good As It Gets

More
PiraBit
1940/04/14

if their story seems completely bonkers, almost like a feverish work of fiction, you ain't heard nothing yet.

More
Humaira Grant
1940/04/15

It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.

More
utgard14
1940/04/16

Gothic melodrama from Universal, adapted from the Nathaniel Hawthorne novel (with significant changes) about the cursed Pyncheon family and one brother framing another for murder. Often included in Universal horror discussions, though it's not a horror film. It does have some nice atmosphere in keeping with that genre, though, particularly given that it shares the same look and feel of the Universal horror films being made around that time.Margaret Lindsay, an often underrated actress who never really hit it big, isn't entirely convincing in the early scenes as the innocent young Hepzibah. She really brings it when the plot moves forward and she becomes older and more jaded. Vincent Price does well in one of his earliest big roles. George Sanders reportedly didn't care for his role or the film but you would never know it by his great turn. Dick Foran holds his own against far more talented co-stars.None of the changes to the novel seem to hurt it, in my opinion. It's a very enjoyable film. Even though it's not a horror movie, I do think it will appeal to people who like those Universal classics. Some nice atmosphere, a good story, and a great cast.

More
rllpnt
1940/04/17

I visited the house of seven Gables in 1996 & I fell in love with the house from that day on. I dreamed of living in a house like that full of love in it & with the man I love. It is the most beautiful house I ever saw. I will always love the house for all eternity. I believe the house loves me too. I am a woman who loves the victorian age. I am now going to be 52 years old & on my second life with a chef. I hope to visit the house before the end of my life. It feels as if the house is calling me to it. Maybe in the summer we will go there to see the house again & then I will whisper to the house that I came back to tell it I love it & I belong there I believe.

More
billsue5
1940/04/18

I must say I was a little disappointed with this movie. It strayed far from the book written by Nathaniel Hawthorne. I had to do a term paper in college on this story and thought that by watching the movie I could better understand what Hawthorne was writing about. It is a good thing I read the book first. It would have been much better had they followed the book. They skipped so much of the original story that it barely resembled THE HOUSE OF THE SEVEN GABLES.

More
rayd-2
1940/04/19

The screen writer took great liberties with the original work by Hawthorne. Relationships are changed to allow a love interest. Hepzibah Pyncheon becomes the cousin of Clifford Pyncheon, rather than his sister, to allow the romance to weave itself throughout the film. Also the character of Clifford is altered to make him heroic, something he is not in the book. Added are a trial, which was never in the book. Great emphasis is place on the dedication of Matthew Maule to the cause of abolition. Hawthorne never stressed this. The greatest shortcoming is the lack of emphasis on the house itself. It plays a major role in the novel but in the film it is just another building in which the action takes place. Overall it is not a bad film but if one is trying to capture the essence of what Hawthorne was writing, the film misses the major points.

More