Arch of Triumph (1985)

The Worst Film Ever

Great Film overall

When a movie has you begging for it to end not even half way through it's pure crap. We've all seen this movie and this characters millions of times, nothing new in it. Don't waste your time.

Exactly the movie you think it is, but not the movie you want it to be.

The 1948 war drama with Charles Boyer and Ingrid Bergman was a messy post- war romantic drama. Remaking it for T.V. with a not yet big star Anthony Hopkins and the beautiful but icy Leskey Anne Downe, a huge mistake. What could have been intriguing in either version shows this to really revolve around only a shell of a story and what's there isn't all that interesting. Hopkins is a victim of Nazi brutality, having been scarred by the evil Donald Pleasance years before for hiding Jews, and now in Paris, he is haunted by sightings of the evil Nazi and the sudden protector of the mysterious Downe whom he stops from killing herself. Their encounter is interrupted by nightmares of his past, as well as his involvement in a mysterious mission against the enemy. Essentially a snoozer, this has great location footage and an intriguing performance by Hopkins (who would ironically play Hitler), but not much else for me to pass the copy of the DVD I bought of this (cheap!) on to friends.

I have seen this movie some 21 yrs. ago, on a Russian channel, so of course in Russian, and it made an extremely powerful impression on me at that time; I would rather speak of the impression it produced back—then. I was a child, I knew none of the actors—I had a taste for such melodramas, I guess. I kept the image of a handsome, dependable, reliable man in the leading role; only in '94, I guess, I found out that the physician had been performed by Hopkins. When, at the age of 11 or 12, I have drawn a list of the movies I liked best, this one had its place.As idea, it's a distinguished melodrama.Today I have seen it for a second time; I like it, though it made a much poorer impression this time, it looked like slapdash, with both the lead roles very badly written, and also less romantic than I remembered; unglamorous and bad in a very TV way (the clumsiness of the camera, the lack of style, the primitivism ). Yet, I understand why I liked Hopkins so much in this role; and there is no other role of his that I like better than this one. His performance is very good, restrained but energetic and manly. And I liked the movie again. I may acknowledge its defects, and still recommend it.Even if only very concisely ,the Hopkins movie gives a high impression of the medical profession.The cast is sensational—Hopkins , his beautiful lover, and Pleasance –whom I was to remark several yrs. later, in a Dudikoff adventure flick, again as a Nazi character.I would like to see sometimes the other, first adaptation.

Let's face it: Anthony Hopkins is an excellent actor but he is absolutely no leading man, romantically speaking. He is called upon to do some romantic acting here and fails miserably.There should have been fear in the air as World War 11 approaches to 1939 France. Instead, we have an unbelievably dull film. Donald Pleasence shows up in time to be killed for torturing Hopkins and others in a concentration camp. There is no explanation whatsoever why Hopkins, a non-Jew in the film, was placed in the camp to begin with. When Hopkins kills Pleasence, he suddenly feels this is routine and gets no satisfaction for doing this. How about the misery that he and others endured?Down is good here, but the writing and background pulls this film down.

I stumbled on this movie not intending to watch it but was captivated by it's 1940's feel even though it's in colour. OK it was made for TV and was never intended to be a Hollywood blockbuster but it's full of atmosphere and has an ambiance that held me to the end. I felt I was in 1939 Paris with all the tensions of imminent invasion. There are the large numbers of desperate illegal immigrants fleeing areas where the Nazis have occupied. There are hotels where no papers are necessary and low lit bars where people play pool and chess with equal comfort as well as class restaurants where even fire eaters provide entertainment for your dinning pleasure. The romance is the centre of the story and provides sufficient interest without sexually explicit scenes. The two are outcasts from society find fulfilment in one another although that is short lived due their own circumstances. They are both successful in their own right, he a doctor (Anthony Hopkins) and she a singer/actress (Lesley-Anne Down), but for one reason or another they must rise above their fate to date. I would recommended this movie if you are in the mood for atmosphere over polish.