Home > Documentary >

Martial Law 9-11: Rise of the Police State

Martial Law 9-11: Rise of the Police State (2005)

June. 08,2005
|
7.1
|
NR
| Documentary War

Evil has spread across the land. Martial Law: 9/11 Rise of the Police State exposes the high-tech control grid that is being set up across America Out of the ashes of the September 11th tragedy, a dark empire of war and tyranny has risen. The Constitution has been shredded and America is now a Police State. This film exposes not just who was behind the 9-11 attacks, but the roots and history of its orchestrators.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

KnotMissPriceless
2005/06/08

Why so much hype?

More
ThiefHott
2005/06/09

Too much of everything

More
Lovesusti
2005/06/10

The Worst Film Ever

More
FeistyUpper
2005/06/11

If you don't like this, we can't be friends.

More
akasutsnabelaf
2005/06/12

This is a very poor documentary. The people that believe in these documentaries are all fanatics. They want it to be USA who is the big villain. The want USA to have planned 9/11 - because that is what their political ideals tell them.The scientific magazine "Popular Mechanics" have debunked all the lies of the Comnspiracy theorists. But the conspiracy theorists reacted, not by disproving the facts and point of "Popular Mechanics", but by saying that all the 5 or 10 journalists was part of the conspiracy (plus the 300 experts (mainly aviation/demolition-experts and building engineers) was part of this massive conspiracy too). How illogical that sounds, the conspiracy theorists still believe in the 9/11-lies, because it is not about reality or science anymore - it is about religion. Conspiracy theories are a modern religion. Alex Jones is a good example of the prophets of such religions (thou they are false religions, people believe in them blindly, so it is OK to call it religion).Conspiracy theorists should be fought by everyone who lives in the reel world. Because many of these conspiracy-theorists, live in their mothers basement, and talk like they are experts in buildings, airplanes and demolition. And that could be a problem, if they can convince too many people that these lies are reality. It is good that Oliver Stone, king of conspiracies (He made "JFK"), have made a picture about 9/11 without any conspiracies involving Jews, controlled-demolition or holographic airplanes (there are actually people that believe in such things). The problem with conspiracy theories is that they are political of nature - not scientific. When a conspiracy theorists is working on a theory - based on a world-known event, such as 9/11 - then the conspiracy theorists starts with the conclusion, and works from that. Making evidence fit, and ignoring all contradicting evidence to the elected theory.So don't watch this, unless you are to examine all the evidence presented in this documentary (in neutral-sources, as well as anti-conspiracy-sites and pro-conspiracy-sites). Otherwise keep away from this "documentary", and warn all people against it (because you can see that it is only made by only one person in a basement with poor equipment and no knowledge of science or engineering).

More
lortepik912
2005/06/13

This so-called "documentary", made by the uneducated Alex Jones, is at first a very believable film. But if you know something about science or the world then it is just fully flawed. I mangle this up with another poorly made conspiracy-film "loose change", which also states that the Bush-administration was behind 9/11.And do anyone even think that the Bush administration is competent enough to do such a thing, planning such an attack: No, they are the most incompetent Government in many years. But to all with intelligence it is a laughable theory. I went to many of the pages that tries to prove it, and they are all poorly made, by former x-files/star trek fans. All of the sites are very poorly made, many spelling errors, and poorly knowledge of science and physics. And it those sites this film (i will not call it a documentary, because it is a film, I.E. fiction) is based on, more or less. On of the many allegations of this film and its clones, is that the pentagon, on 9/11 was hit by a placed bomb or a missile. A very flawed theory, because the only thing the bases this on, is that you could not See the remains of the plane: of course you could not, the kinetic energy was so tense, that the plane was ripped to pieces very quickly (apparant to most people, that have had basic physics). Plus the did find millions of small pieces of plane at the pentagon, but the conspiracy-people then say that it was planted (yeah right, thousands of small pieces, in 3 minutes, LOL, pathetic theory). Then they claim that the Pentagon's air-defense/SAM-sites would have shot the plane down!! But as the Magazine, popular mechanics showed: it is a lie - there have never been advanced anti-aircraft-artillery at the pentagon, such would only be there in time of war. Plus there are constantly helicopters flying in and from the pentagon. Yet another direct lie from the conspirators (but they live on lies ($)). Then they so wrongfully claim that the planes that hit the World trade center, could not have put down the towers, because the jet fuel could not be so hot as to melt iron = once again the conspirators show that they don't know practical physics. When Iron gets heated up, it gets more weak, it can collapse, even if it is not melted. Plus it was so hot that it made the metal expand (a surprise to the conspiracy theorists i think), so that it made the concrete smolder and crack, making the whole building weaken, and suddenly collapse. The conspirators then claim that there was placed explosives in the towers, to take it down, about 1800 kilo-grammes or more. Well they don't know anything about explosives do they, such would require a lot of space (so it would be seen by the people there), and it would require VERY many cables, because you cant set the charge by electronics = to much electronic interference. More and more i say to my self: cant the conspirators just leave the problems to people with education?? but no, they are making money of it.There are simply to much evidence that speaks against all of Alex Jones claims.The magazine "popular mechanics" have already shown that it is based on ignorance, or the need to get rich of people who loves conspiracies (Alex Jones are making more and more money all the time, as the theories are getting more popular).

More
Muttines
2005/06/14

This film doesn't even profess to offer an objective or impartial account of contemporary events and shouldn't be dismissed out-of-hand for not aspiring to such a chimerical, and practically impossible, goal. Given the overt bias that pervades and plagues the mainstream media, perhaps such self-acknowledged subjectivity is a necessary, if not less deviant, methodological approach.In terms of tone, rhetoric and visual presentation, this documentary issues a rather paranoid, anxious, but nonetheless credible view of the state of the world in which we and our subsequent offspring will live (or perhaps, be condemned?).Jones uses well-researched, factually-supported arguments, most of which can be verified using mainstream media archives, to irrefutably prove the use of explosives to bring down the Twin Towers and (the third) Building No.7 on the 11th of September 2001. However, this aspect only represents a portion of the film's running time - the rest is dedicated to perhaps more shocking, obscure, (yet consistently supported and appropriately-cited) discussions on the subversive funding of Adolf Hitler by American Internationalists and their relationship with the Bush family: a family that today hold an increasingly arbitrary grip on power in the world's most powerful nation. Critics of Jones' work tend to resort to two tactics. The first is 'ad hominem': instead of presenting a logical counter-argument to his well-cited and widely-researched discussion, they attempt to attack the character of the man himself, conveniently bypassing the facts rendered. The second is to ridicule the aesthetic presentation and format of his production: an approach which works toward the same end, and intriguingly avoids confuting the empirical arguments presented in the work. Very much recommended. For more specialised and detailed documentaries scrutinising the official story of 9/11, see the fantastic (and very much BANNED in the Land of the Free) "Loose Change: 2nd Edition" and an equally authoritative lecture recorded at Wisconsin University, Madison and given by the respected academic Dr. Ray Griffin (author of "The New Pearl Harbour" and "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions").

More
angelusnd
2005/06/15

Ignore most of these negative reviews. Watch it yourself and keep in mind if you have watched all his films and his weekly reports like i have you will know he proves all his points many many times with links to mainstream media reports or articles AND experts.Even if you don't believe the truth like so many don't want to. There is still the fact that there are so many unanswered questions about 911 and has been Proved that the official story is a lie.Alex Jones lets you copy and give away copies of his film to spread the word of whats really happening in this world. Please go check out his website prison planet.com or info wars.com fantastic.He is also appearing in a film soon with Keanu Reeves, Downey Jr and George Clooney called A Scanner Darkly coming out soon

More