Dummy (1979)

Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

While it is a pity that the story wasn't told with more visual finesse, this is trivial compared to our real-world problems. It takes a good movie to put that into perspective.

This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

I didn’t really have many expectations going into the movie (good or bad), but I actually really enjoyed it. I really liked the characters and the banter between them.

Your found by authorities with blood on your hands and accused of murder. Your apprehended and thrown in locked cell. You don't know what the commotion is about and to make matters worse your deaf and mute, you can't communicate with anyone. This is the tragic story of the life and troubled times of Donald Lang. A deaf loading dock worker from Chicago who frequented neighborhood bars and dens of iniquity with his earnings. One faithful night Donald walked off with a prostitute. Moments Later Donald was found by police in an alley over the dead prostitute's body. A deaf mute but not like most with his misfortune. Donald was born deaf and at the critical age of six was about to embark on a school for the deaf to learn how to sign, lip reading, read and write to communicate with the outside world.Due to untimely circumstances, Donald's parents split up and with financial burdens were unable to send the boy to the deaf school rendering him illiterate,irresponsible and over protective leaving him unprepared in life and in this case murder. Unable to stand trial because of an earlier supreme court decision that a defendant must understand the charges against him and have the ability to aid his attorney in his own defense, poor Donald lacked the skills to even form a simple sentence. Enter Deaf Attorney from the State of Illinois, Lowell Myers An extraordinary individual highly educated with numerous credentials. A Masters in Business Administration, B.A in accounting, C.P.A. and a Law Degree.Mr. Myers being a tax attorney and CPA was a ground breaking advocate for the hearing impaired in the State of Illinois. Getting legislation passed for the deaf in fraudulent business contracts and phony real estates deals manifesting into law that an interpreter be present when signing any contract involving a deaf person. Also Myers lobbied for the Deaf to obtain Drivers licence in the State of Illinois emphasizing that a deaf driver has a deeper concentration at the wheel and does not get distracted. With Donald Lang in Jail, Lowell Myers fought for his right for due process. It took a few years but a trial was finally held. This challenging made-for-TV movie gives us an unprecedented look at a person who can't fend for himself. LeVar Burton as the frustrated Lang, makes great use of pantomime throughout with his physical gestures borrowed from his role as the captured slave Kunta Kinte in the famous "Roots" series. Personally I feel that this was Paul Sorvino's finest role and I've seen quite a bit of his work. The concentration of his fractured speech emulates a deaf person's voice perfectly and consistently through out the movie. Brian Dennehy as Lang's boss does a fine job in a supporting role. I watched and most importantly learned about two separate individuals both branded with deafness. Guilty or innocent? I learned a great deal from this movie. Other movies like Amistad and Johnny Belinda also feature court scenes with persons who could not defend themselves due to hearing loss or language barriers.

This was an excellent film in so many ways. The acting, the directing, the use of actual facts regarding the legal system and the obstacles faced by handicapped persons (in the form of the deaf characters portrayed by LeVar Burton and Paul Sorvino). I saw the movie when it first appeared on television several years back and then a few years ago it was broadcast again late at night and I taped it. When I watched it again I was once more moved close to tears by the things which Burton's character was forced to endure.On a side note, one of the things this film did unintentionally was to give me the ability to learn how to communicate better with my family members who were hard of hearing. Watching Sorvino as Lowell Myers I paid close attention to how he would carefully form each word and feel the words vibrate along the back of his ears and through his throat and lips. I had an aunt with whom communication for me had been very difficult until I learned to do this, along with looking directly at a person when speaking. Admittedly to speak in such a manner, since it is slower and each word is carefully formed can at times sound mechanical but I cannot argue with the positive results. I have also used a similar method with communicating with people who are just beginning to learn the English language and again it is successful.

I remember watching this film twice as a kid, I haven't seen it since. Ernest Tidyman wrote the screenplay for it (he is the same guy who wrote The French Connection). LeVar Burton made his debut as Kunta Kinte in Roots (what a great way to start your career). He said at the time that this was the most challenging role imaginable, playing a deaf and dumb young man accused of murder. Donald Lang is a 20 year old who lives with his siblings and works on the loading docks, he is charged with murdering a prostitue. Lowell Myers is a deaf lawyer who takes on his case. Paul Sorvino is an excellent actor who always delivers and he takes on this challenging role as well. This movie makes it out like there is evidence that Donald Lang was innocent and didn't kill the hooker Ernestine Myers. A woman tells his lawyer that she heard Myers having an argument in the alley where she was murdered with another man and she heard his voice! Lang is taken back to the alley where she was killed and "acts out" a scene where he fights with another man who was the real killer. Sorvino makes an excellent speech at the conclusion where he talks about how a deaf mute is still entitled to the same rights as everyone else. He points out how Charlie Chaplin could make an audience laugh and cry and not use one single word. Its a great speech that tugs at your heartstrings its true, but folks I need to point out something. Every time Hollywood makes a film about a real life murder case, they always make it out like the criminal in question was INNOCENT! Why in the hell do they do this? Is Hollywood full of bleeding heart liberals who pee their pants every time someone is accused of a crime and God forbid if they are poor or African American! Evil comes in all colors and Donald Lang was evil and he was GUILTY! Five years after the murder of Ernestine Myers he was released from the asylum. Shortly afterwards, there was another woman who was murdered and he was seen leaving a bar with her. This time, there was overwhelming physical evidence that Lang was the killer and he was sent to prison for the rest of his life. If our legal system worked the way it should, this woman needn't have died. Donald Lang really was a killer and no amount of moralizing by Hollywood can change that cold hard fact. This film sort of reminded me of The Hurricane about Rubin Carter. It is a well made film with fine actors, but at the same time you have to take it with a grain of salt folks because the murdering son of a bitch really did it! CASE CLOSED!!!!!

i saw this film a very long time ago and its impact was tremendous. so much so that although i had long forgotten the title i had not forgotten the film. only since i have been on the internet have i been able to trace the name of the film and subsequently look out for it on british tv or sky. so far though i have not come across it again. this film is more than worthy of a reshowing and i, for one, would be very pleased to see it again. i would go as far as to say that this film has haunted me for all this time.