Home > Thriller >

A Window in London

A Window in London (1940)

June. 15,1940
|
6.5
| Thriller

A man witnesses a murder that isn't a murder, only to get involved with the magician and his wife who created the illusion. The insanely jealous magician husband eventually kills his wife, making for complications in life of unhappily married man who is now involved more than he ever thought he would be.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Reviews

Actuakers
1940/06/15

One of my all time favorites.

More
Beanbioca
1940/06/16

As Good As It Gets

More
Intcatinfo
1940/06/17

A Masterpiece!

More
Tobias Burrows
1940/06/18

It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.

More
mark.waltz
1940/06/19

Witnessing an apparent murder while taking a train to work, bridge builder Michael Redgrave gets involved and finds more than he bargained for with Sally Gray, the apparent victim. It's a strange setup, starting with Redgrave's wife (Patricia Roc) walking out on her job and ignoring important instructions, heading home for time with her husband. The focus then switches to Redgrave, getting a police officer to break in on the apparent murder, only to find that there wasn't one it's egocentric magician Paul Lukas and his own wife (Gray) allegedly rehearsing, but as we soon see, Lukas is jealous, domineering and even a bit maniacal. Redgrave's intrusion into their lives increases and he manages to sneak Gray out of the theater during a performance. Meanwhile, Roc is fired from her job and becomes concerned when her husband does not come home.This is bizarre, not only in structure, but in its general storytelling. There seems to be no real point in the twists and turns, and after a while I began to realize that there was no real reason for the many directions this seems to be going in. What works here are all the little details. The film opens with a shot of the Thames and the many bridges that cross, plus there's also extended location sequences of regular people going about their day. Even a rehearsal between Lukas and Gray goes into detail with his egotistical explosions and proper choreography of how the act is supposed to work. If I learned anything from this, it's to try to stay out of people's business as much as possible. You never realize the messes that can add onto your own. Be warned: the ending is a real downer!

More
kidboots
1940/06/20

Just a terrific little movie - a variation of "Lady on a Train"(1945) and then some!! Instead of a dotty Deanna Durbin addicted to detective stories, you have a young Michael Redgrave as Peter, a sleep deprived mechanic who, as befits wartime austerity, is juggling shifts with his telephonist wife Pat (a young and very pretty Patricia Roc) - they only see each other over breakfast tea and toast!! Then disaster strikes - Pat is sacked but Peter is having an adventure that day that will top hers!! While on the train to work Peter thinks he sees a murder but when he fronts up to the flat with a policeman in hand, it is to find he has only witnessed a rehearsal from the Great Zoltini (Paul Lukas) and his rather nervous assistant Vivian (Sally Grey) - it was all an illusion!!But the reality is different - Zoltini is volatile and insanely jealous, Viv, though loving him, is frightened and fed up!! When Peter is cornered by a roving reporter for a "hero of the hour" interview, the hard luck story the Zoltini's tell him about their once great success evaporating due to a fickle public, makes front page news and they find theatre managers clamouring for their act!! But only because of the admiration and liking for Vivian - as soon as they get to the theatre Zoltini throws tantrum after tantrum!! He is so impossible Vivian does the unforgivable and walks out before the finish leaving Zoltini a laughing stock on the stage. She runs into Peter and through his confidence and support she finds the strength to leave Zoltini.For just over an hour, it packs plenty of wallop, once Peter leaves Viv with the man who's always loved her and can make her a success, life becomes more simple. Pat has now got her old job back with an added bonus that she is now on day shift, but the ending has a gruesome twist of which Peter is blissfully unaware of.By 1940 Sally Grey had already been in films for 10 years but as this film showed she was very capable of tackling characters of many dimensions. First billed Paul Lukas had already spent the 1930s as a dependable Hollywood star. This movie was made just before his return to America where he found his greatest triumph as the sympathetic German in both the stage and film versions of "Watch on the Rhine".Highly Recommended.

More
howardmorley
1940/06/21

In 1938 Paul Lukas and Michael Redgrave crossed swords in the acclaimed "The Lady Vanishes" and here two years on they have another bout with the illusionist Zoltini played by Paul Lukas and Michael Redgrave as Peter from their respective former roles of Dr.Harz and Gilbert.This time Patricia Roc plays Pat, Peter's wife while "hot totty" Sally Gray plays Vivienne married to Zoltini.Other reviewers have discussed the basic plot and no I won't provide a spoiler as there is a kick in the end of the film which is well produced.I wonder how many buildings survived the forthcoming blitz from 1940 onwards as there are some interesting shots of London filmed in 1939 with the tube trains running.I found the screenplay somewhat contrived especially the scene where the tycoon misses his plane to Moscow which crashed because telephonist Pat failed to first warn him about his flight.However this incident gives the producer the excuse to follow the moral cinema code and enabled both Pat and Peter to go to both work together during the day and not continue with their "Cox & Box" sleeping arrangements.Peter had a job keeping his hands off Sally Gray's character and remembering his marriage vows.Offstage, blonde Sally Gray married a lord and lived to be 90 and her husband to 100!Imdb.com rated this film 6.9 when I wrote this review and I rated it 6 as above average.

More
malcolmgsw
1940/06/22

This film is not just interesting for its intriguing story but also for its view of London in 1939 just before the outbreak of war.Many central areas around the Houses of Parliament and the Abbey are on view.Also of course the construction of the present Waterloo Bridge which has a distinctive modernist style quite unlike any other London Bridge.The film has many virtues and one failing.The story is very neat with a ending with a twist in it.I am surprised the censor let it through as of course crime had to be shown not to pay.The one failing is the casting of Michael Redfrave.A crane driver he is not.he is far too refined.In fact his is the least interesting role.Bt far the best and showiest is that of Paul Lukas who does well in what for him would become a stereotypical role.All round an extremely interesting and entertaining film.

More