Vampires: Out For Blood (2004)

You won't be disappointed!

It's not great by any means, but it's a pretty good movie that didn't leave me filled with regret for investing time in it.

Very good movie overall, highly recommended. Most of the negative reviews don't have any merit and are all pollitically based. Give this movie a chance at least, and it might give you a different perspective.

what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.

seriously, what the heck were these people thinking when they made this? some would say that there are far worser vampire movies out there, and i agree whole heartedly. but this thing can certainly butt heads with the crappiest of them, the plot is so overused it's as dead and hollow as the acting. the makeup was laugh out loud funny, if they were going for a menacing scary look they failed at the very start. and don't even get me started on the "MASTER VAMPIRE" most hilarious thing i have ever seen, he tries so hard to convey the impending doom thing that it's sad, i mean have you ever seen a vampire with a respiratory disorder? the only two people that could be taken serious was the main guy and Lance can't spell his last name. the people who try to praise this joke are seriously lacking the ability to distinguish a good or half decent movie from a god awful one, giving this film any sort of credit is like saying Hitler was a hero. to make a long story short it's terrible if you want to see a vamp movie with some actual good story writing watch Blade, Underworld, Bram Stokers Dracula, Interview with a vampire, and many more good ones. just avoid this one

A few years ago I read a really good vampire novel called "Out for blood" by John Peyton Cooke, and I could not put it down.And then I heard about this movie with the same title also about Vampirism and thought it was cool that the book became a movie.It turned out that it was a different story all together and "vampires-out for blood" was not based on the book I read.But I really ended up liking the movie anyways.For a lower budget(but not too low)movie about vampires it really wasn't bad. It was easy to follow and easy to relate to and get into. I have always liked Kevin Dillon and he played the part of the cop well.This film for the budget has OK special effects and a decent storyline.I really liked how the movie played with your mind so you didn't know if what was happening to the detective was real or just in his head because of his obsession with his ex-wife and her fascination with vampires.Either way,it was an original and somewhat more believable movie with it's twist at the end.Lance Henriksen also did an outstanding job playing the skeptical police captain. The only part that wasn't really necessary was all the nudity.It would have been better if there were at least some same sex couples making out during the orgy scene as well to make it more realistic.I mean cm-on it is Los Angeles for Chrissakes!I don't think it would have hurt the movie by any means,especially this type of movie.

In Los Angeles, Detective Hank Holten (Kevin Dillon) is obsessed by his ex-wife, the writer of vampire novels Susan Hastings (Vanessa Angel), stalking her and having drinking problems. His chief and friend, Captain John Billings (Lance Henriksen), makes him promise to forget her and stop drinking, and assigns Hank to find Layla Simmons (Jody Lyn O'Keefe), who is missing and without notice to her family. Hank goes to a rave party, finds Layla, they go to an orgy party in an old building, and while having sex with her, Hank finds that the place is a vampire nest. He is bitten by the vampire-leader, but nobody believes on him. He looks for Susan to help him."Out For Blood" is not so bad as IMDb User Rating of 3.7 indicates. The story has many flaws and clichés, but is interesting; Vanessa Angel is not a good actress, indeed she is awful; I like Kevin Dillon, but he is very weird in this movie; but in the end, "Out for Blood" is an above average vampire story. The scenes with the vampire Alex are very funny and Kenneth Colom has a good performance. Jody Lyn O'Keefe is tremendously sexy. The music score is excellent. Therefore, with lower expectations and liking vampire films, this B-movie may entertain. My vote is six.Title (Brazil): "Sangue de Lobo" ("Wolf Blood")

*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*A down and out cop has vampire problems. Everywhere he looks: vampires. Nobody believes him. He must be crazy. Or is he? Fortunately for him, his estranged wife happens to have a lust for vampires. How convenient! She can't wait to hop on the vampire hunting train. Together they must do battle against the decadent vampire cult and their master vampire.Predictable? Yes. Full to the brim with vampire movie clichés? Yeah. Entertaining? I thought so. Vampires. Blood. Stakes. Massive vampire orgy. It's all here. Vampires are becoming associated with pure decadence these days. Every vampire you meet loves the nightlife, loves to boogie. They're not as smooth and charismatic as they once were. Now they dress in leather and troll the clubs for horny victims. It works for me.So our hero goes bumbling around Los Angeles hoping to run into more vampires. He tries to convince his captain that vampires are to blame for all of the murders. Amazingly, the captain doesn't believe him. It would be hard to when the vampires have the fastest dead body cleaning service in the world. Bloodstains disappear in seconds. It's really quite impressive. Soon he realizes the futility of trying to explain it and just decides to kill them all. A stake in one hand and a crossbow in the other is all any real vampire hunter needs. This leads to much blood and stake pounding.I was satisfied with this one. If you don't mind being bombarded with vampire movie clichés, it's worth a look.