Hunt to Kill (2010)

Sorry, this movie sucks

One of the most extraordinary films you will see this year. Take that as you want.

The best films of this genre always show a path and provide a takeaway for being a better person.

The movie really just wants to entertain people.

The other reviews on here have detailed the stupidity of the action, but I signed up on this site specifically to warn you of the witch (try with a b) that he is wasting my time trying to save. His daughter starts the problem when she gets hauled into the police station for...wait for it...shoplifting. We are supposed to be endeared to her, because...I really don't know why...but she goes back and forth between calling him Daddy, and accusing him of trying to kill her. In the end, they walk off into the sunset, and without so much as a 'thanks', or 'sorry', she starts demanding a brand new car, as a reward for starting the problem to begin with. On a side note...anyone who packs a crossbow without packing the bolts (arrows) for it, never would have survived long enough to hang the bag in the first place!! And anyone who would use rotting swamp twigs in place of the real bolts, is suicidal! He also had access to guns, but left them on the bodies (that he never checked to see if they were dead), opting to fall off two cliffs just like Davey Boone. Or is it Daniel Crockett? Honestly, I couldn't find a good guy to root for, but the she-crook was the only one close to believable.

Some bad guys kidnap some people and force them to guide them through some woods.The oddest thing about this movie is that it has two relatively well known names in it - Gil Bellows as the main baddie and wrestler Steve Austin as the goodie. Otherwise it is an unexceptional action(-ish) movie with a pronounced nasty streak. Bellows, in particular, seizes every opportunity to chew the scenery with the greatest of relish. This does not make his performance good. Steve Austin is a wrestler not an actor (although I do appreciate the contradiction inherent in that statement). Most of the other cast are forgettable. There are some bloody effects, and the winter hostility of the forest comes across. Otherwise there is little to recommend this film.

Truly awfully directed. Steve Austin brings it up to a 4 out of 10 just for being Steve Austin.Villain - bearable. Hot girls - watchable. Deaths - unrealistic.Setting - decent. Characters thought process - laughable. Ending - painful. Storyline - dull.Movie - barely watchable.Thats my views on the movie anyway. Thought there was too many stupid scenes in this movie to be considered good. *SPOILERS* Small things such as using an axe or a stick instead of guns which are in sight or even on them. Not tieing up or keeping watch on steve austin while asleep. And don't get me started on the bit where Steve was suppose to die.

Oh dear. I don't expect much from an "action" flick starring Steve Austen, but this managed to tick all the bad film boxes.Poor script, poor acting and terrible direction, but worst of all was the plot, if it's not an insult to plots to call it that. There were so many holes and improbable coincidences, it's hard to know where to begin, but I'll point out a few which will make sense if you have had the misfortune to see the film:Why did Lawson leave the bomb in the place most likely to be found by the other baddies? Not very clever. Why did he wire the bomb so that the cutting of the only wire connecting the phone to the explosives deactivates it? Not very sophisticated. Why did he wait a good five minutes after making off with the loot before deciding to make the call, giving others plenty of time to find and deactivate the bomb? Getting really thin, now. When other baddies find the bomb, they all stand around it discussing what to do (putting their fingers in their ears in case it explodes). They are in a big warehouse (conveniently with only one exit - they couldn't shoot the lock?) full of equipment and stuff. It doesn't occur to any of them to barricade the bomb in one corner and barricade himself in the opposite one. Why did Lawson try to get to Canada through the woods when he could have just driven across the border? Geez this guy was stupid. The other end of the rope tying up the daughter was held in Dominika's hand. Ooo - very secure! Why did the baddies not tie Austin up at night to prevent him attempting to escape/kill them? How did the watch strap turn into so much climbing rope? Why did Austin retrieve the bag without getting Banks to let the girl go first? Rather dim. A bit convenient when Austin finds the bag with the bow in it? When did Austin get the time to build the hide beneath which he was camouflaged before attacking Jensen? Austin then shoots Jensen - in the backpack? Why not through the neck or head! Dominika finds Jensen's backpack, but not Jensen's body, a few feet away. Not much of a search! Why did Austin, having picked the baddies off one by one (Rambo-style), does he choose to run, completely exposed, across a rock face in full view of Banks? When Banks has Austin semi-conscious and totally at his mercy, why does he choose to run off and leave him to recover? Banks finds the scooters. He knows he can get away. He has already ruthlessly killed several of his fellow baddies, cops etc, but he chooses to merely punch Austin's daughter. Not very likely. And finally, and worst of all: - Banks finds three scooters. He is being chased by two goodies. Why, in heaven's name, doesn't he disable the other two?I don't mind a little bit of dramatic licence for plot development purposes, but this film just took it way too far. Don't waste your time.