Home > Adventure >

The Curse of King Tut's Tomb

The Curse of King Tut's Tomb (2006)

April. 11,2006
|
4.3
|
NR
| Adventure Fantasy Horror Action

Thousands of years ago, the great Child King Tutankhamen ruled. Few know the details of his life -- No one knows the secrets of his death. All that is about to change.Free -spirited archaeologist Danny Fremont (Casper Van Dien, Sleepy Hollow) is certain that if found, King Tut's Emerald Tablet would hold the power to control the world. Unfortunately, the only one who believes Fremont is his nemesis archaeologist Morgan Sinclair (Jonathan Hyde, Titanic), a member of a secret society who wants the tablet to harness unspeakable evil on the world and will stop at nothing to get it.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Micitype
2006/04/11

Pretty Good

More
FuzzyTagz
2006/04/12

If the ambition is to provide two hours of instantly forgettable, popcorn-munching escapism, it succeeds.

More
Invaderbank
2006/04/13

The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.

More
Kaelan Mccaffrey
2006/04/14

Like the great film, it's made with a great deal of visible affection both in front of and behind the camera.

More
Paul Magne Haakonsen
2006/04/15

This movie does at first seem like a copy of the "Indiana Jones" movies, and it does bear a lot of striking resemblances to those movies. That being said, don't get me wrong. Because "The Curse of King Tut's Tomb" is an entertaining movie. Sure it may not have had the same budget as the "Indiana Jones" movies, but it did manage to hold its own well enough.The story is about archaeologist Danny Freemont (played by Casper Van Dien) who is after four emerald fragments of a mystical tablet that Tutankhamon broke in order to keep Set and his demonic spawn from the world of man. At the same time a secret order, with a sinister agenda of their own, is chasing after the very same four fragments for using in their dark dealings."The Curse of King Tut's Tomb" does offer entertainment, action and excitement in a very "Indiana Jones"-like way. If you enjoyed those type of adventure movies, then you will also enjoy this particular movie.The CGI effects were adequate for the purpose they served. Just don't expect it to dazzle your mind and blow you away.There is a good continuous flow to the movie and storyline, and the people on the cast list were doing good jobs with their given roles and characters. The movie runs about two hours and forty minutes, so you will be in for an extended evening of adventure.The scene with the dead guy had me laughing, because you could so clearly see his eyes fluttering and his chest heaving as he was breathing.The movie does have an appeal to both young and mature audience. I was thoroughly entertained by this movie, and it surprised me when it turned out much better than I had anticipated.

More
silvermoon132
2006/04/16

Lets be honest, this is no master piece. But it is good mindless entertainment.I think that all the people going on about the bad directing and less than believable storyline are really quite ignorant and foolish. This movie is clearly marketed towards male teens and people looking for a cheap fantasy story. If you are in to things like that (star trek, stargate, etc) then you will probably like this movie. If, however, you expect to see Oscar winning performances in this movie...well then you are also foolish and ignorant.Realistically, the acting is not that bad. Several people pull off relatively impressive performances. The characters are likable for the most part, the plot is rather interesting, and all things considered the special effects are not that terrible.Basically, after the first 10 to 20 minutes the movie is quite enjoyable. Once you get past the completely unbelievable storyline and accept the film for what it is you can get into it.But unfortunately, if you are a snob who only watches movies of the highest caliber you will not be able to see this movie as a humorous satire like I did. Certainly it is not worth paying $7.50 for to see in the theater, but I think it was time well spent.

More
ma-cortes
2006/04/17

The film starts thousands years ago,under sands of ancient Egypt. The pharaoh Tutankamen rules, few know the events about his life.Tuthankamen really was son from King Amenophis IV and Qeen Nefertiti and he died violently.In the movie he appears fighting evil forces. The king was buried and his tomb eternally curses so that no man would ever again suffer from his evil ways. But thousands years later on a greedy search of Tut's treasure a group of archaeologist break the curse seal the tomb. A crakerjack adventurer(Casper Van Dien,Space troopers)is an adventurer wishes to find King Tut's tablet that would rule the world. But his nemesis Sinclair(Jonathan Hyde,Titanic) along with a secret society(Malcolm McDowell,Clockwork orange and Simon Callow,Room with a view)also want it and will stop at nothing to obtain it. Fremont is helped by a beautiful archaeologist(Leonor Varela,Cleopatra) and a trio friends(Steve Waddington,The last Mohican,among others). They venture into Valley of the Kings where find the Tut's tomb and the curse come out and once again unleashes the savage power.This TV picture is a crossover of Egyptian fantasy:¨Mummy,King Scorpion¨(Stephen Sommers) and adventures and clothes from¨Indiana Jones¨(Spielberg). This is a cheesy fun in the Saturday matinée tradition with excessive and mediocre special effects. The movie contains lots of mummies, skeletons, wizards, as well as spooky tombs. The motion picture is regularly directed by Russell Mulcahy(Razorback,Highlander,Resurrection)who made a similar story about Egyptian curse titled¨Tale of mummy¨. Rating : Average but with some moment entertaining.

More
gloria-47
2006/04/18

One of the most fascinating things about this film (apart from Jonathan Hyde's extraordinary resemblance with Henry Daniell)is watching how the plot meanders and wanders with no destination in sight as if it were an Art Nouveau filigrain.I suspect that the archeology academics would seriously object at the unorthodox -but revolutionary- system that the protagonist and his buddies use to find the legendary Pharaoh's tomb, namely, by sitting in the terraces of Cairo's seediest bars and leaving them without alcoholic stock. Their interest is, however, scientific, except for the legionnaire buddy who is more interested in gold statuettes accidentally getting lost in his greatcoat pockets (Having mentioned the legionnaire, I must say that I admire the courage of the scriptwriter, who reveals to us -for the very first time- that Egypt was at the time a French protectorate, and not, as we've been led to believe by the official history, associated to the British empire)The bad guys stick to the old, slow, boring system of studying the terrain and excavating carefully according to old Ieroglyphs, while our hero and his friends discover the tomb the legendary grave by happily throwing dynamite sticks at random: a new path is opened thus for archeology.

More