Lady Chatterley (1993)

Just what I expected

Good story, Not enough for a whole film

This film is so real. It treats its characters with so much care and sensitivity.

A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.

A really good adaption of the book and the original 1981 film. It is very erotic... quite a bit of nudity and sex. Not recommended for under 16.

I agree that this is a very good adaptation indeed of the novel and the closest in spirit to what Lawrence was writing about in my view. If there is one stereotype however, that Ken Russell (and Lawrence before him) perpetuates beyond reason, it is that a woman can only be sexually stimulated and fulfilled by penetration. It seems ludicrous even for that day and age (when the sexual hypocrisy of Victorian and Edwardian England was still in play), that a man so apparently sophisticated and sexually aware as Sir Clifford does not even consider cunnilingus or manual stimulation of his wife. Sex is therefore reduced to a raw gratification of mutual lust between Lady C and Mellors. Where is the beauty, the sensuality and the giving of true sexual love in all that?

I found it too long and very different from the shorter Ken Russel works I know. His theatrical films have a gift of visionary concision which is utterly incompatible with a 3 1/2 hrs TV production. Connie's dream says much more about her than her visit to Clifford with only her face covered. I kept feeling that Russel was conveying all that was significant in a few short scenes and that most of the remaining screen time was simply decorative, exemplified by Connie and Hilda's tango: pure exercise in style. Some moments can even be enjoyed, but a film lover smells too many rats. Then the ending is so "B-movie", I start to suppose Russell was sneering at his TV audience. There is a feeling of tiredness throughout the film and you are constantly reminded that the plot is so well known, there isn't much to expect in the way of surprises. So you start to make amends... which is what you happens when you are trying to make the best out of something not really satisfactory. This is pleasant but not outstanding TV fiction. A pity that I had been expecting a typical Ken Russel work.

D. H. Lawerence wrote some of my favorite books of all time, including Lady Chatterley's Lover, so at first, I was afraid to watch these short little missives. I was not disappointed, however. It held true to quite a few aspects of the "Sir John Thomas and Lady Jane" version of the book than the original publication, but Lawerence never seemed to be quite satisfied and was always changing. Joely Richardson was a beautiful Lady Chatterley, and Sean Bean seemed the perfect Mellors. James Wilby was so convincing as Clifford that by the end of this movie, you just wanted that horrid wretch to be left alone, wallowing in his misery, because like everything else in his life, Constance was a possession, not a human being. This movie is a timeless treasure for anyone who loves the idea of being in love!