Home > Thriller >

Captain Carey, U.S.A.

Captain Carey, U.S.A. (1950)

February. 21,1950
|
6.5
|
NR
| Thriller Mystery War

Near the end of World War II, a secret American raid on an enemy transportation hub goes very wrong when a turncoat warns the enemy. Led by Capt. Webster Carey, the mission causes the deaths of many bystanders -- among them, Carey believes, his Italian girlfriend, Giulia de Graffi. Back home, Carey stumbles across evidence that might uncover the identity of the informant. But, when he returns to Italy to get even, Carey is stunned by what he finds.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Marketic
1950/02/21

It's no definitive masterpiece but it's damn close.

More
Afouotos
1950/02/22

Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

More
Zandra
1950/02/23

The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.

More
Scarlet
1950/02/24

The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.

More
mikeolliffe
1950/02/25

'Captain' Carey - a movie about how Carey got into the service, his exploits there, his comrades-in-arms??? No, you don't really see Carey in the army at all, and only briefly in the O.S.S at the beginning of the movie - where he's on the same set he's on for the rest of this disaster.Other reviewers have spoken favorably of the set and the 'scenery'! Time to get new glasses, guys. It is possible to shoot on an indoor stage and give the impression you're out-doors - but not here. The terrible lighting gives the game away.Do people who write these reviews actually see the films? The townspeople were NOT upset at Carey because of their financial situation, but because their relatives had been executed by the Nazis as reprisals.There's nothing wrong with betrayal as a theme, but the film-makers made a hash of this one.

More
secondtake
1950/02/26

Captain Carey, U.S.A. (1950)A vastly underrated movie. Not that this is "Casablanca" although there are traces of the same idea, if deliberately backward. A romance is derailed by war, a solitary American exudes indifference, foreign intrigues brew, and the Nazis roam at night causing trouble. The setting is Italy, at first during the war, and then three years later. The man, Alan Ladd (at his best, I think), is an OSS officer and when he returns, as a civilian, you know he has an agenda and a dangerous background. And a girl he once loved who is dead.Or so it goes. The plot is reasonable and actually fascinating. It doesn't unfold with elegance, exactly (you can see a lot of the gist coming), but it is all told beautifully and quickly. The photography is really first rate, notable on its own terms once you look, all by John F. Seitz, one of the era's greats. Between him and Ladd, and some really wonderful sets and convincing back projections, the whole experience is a thrill to inhabit, to feel. And things do happen, with caricatures that make enough sense to work--the blind musician, the rich and mysterious husband, the doctor with suspicious knowledge of everything (he calls Ladd "baby" in a nice American colloquialism). What the movie lacks most of all is a title. I can't believe it hasn't at least been released again with something better, something that hints at the Italian post-war angst that is the meat of the movie. Because this is what makes the murderous intrigues more than just cinematic fillips. In fact, this is another parallel to "Casablanca" (that was no joke above): the movie has a hidden purpose, to help the American public reconcile with the most conspicuous of German Allies, the Italians. It is layered, interesting, and dramatic. It lurches every now and then, and I suppose Ladd, as good as he is, is no Bogart, and certainly his love interest, played by Wanda Hendrix, is no Ingrid Bergman (Hendrix is a weak link all through, actually, more girl next door than the movie needs). Give this a whirl, and expect something quite a bit more than others, and the title, have suggested.

More
dbdumonteil
1950/02/27

Captain Carey,US Army (check the title) comes back to Italy to unmask an informer who gave his group away to the Germans .He thought that the Italian girl who helped him then was dead but she reappears ,à la "Laura" and she might be the one who....unless it's his husband (which is really too bad for he was in love with her of course)or some vile wop.Ther's a good depiction of the Italian village and their hostility to the Yankee whose activities were cause for reprisals among the population.A woman is waiting for her husband 's name to be cleared ,for his young son (played by Rusty (Russ) Tamblyn oddly cast as an Italian kid) can't accept the fact that his dad was a traitor anymore.Mitchell Leisen was in healthier shape in the precedent decade ,and "Captain Carey,US " does not compare favorably with earlier works such as "Hold back the dawn" or "to each his own" .However ,it is not as bad as the precedent user wrote .Average.Mitchell Leisen made a volte face after this ho hum effort and gave a very good thriller "No man of her own" the best version of the William Irish novel.

More
herbqedi
1950/02/28

Mona Lisa deservedly won the Academy Award for Best Song. And Celia Lovesky makes a marvelous Contessa in the center of the intrigue being investigated by Ladd. But, the film moves unbearably slowly in its middle, and the chemistry between Ladd and Hendrix is zilch. Overall, it's just another postwar intrigue film.

More