Home > Adventure >

In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds

Watch Now

In the Name of the King 2: Two Worlds (2011)

November. 03,2011
|
3.1
|
R
| Adventure Fantasy Drama Action
Watch Now

Granger, an ex-Special Forces soldier gets thrown back to medieval times to fulfill an ancient prophecy. Venturing through the now war torn Kingdom of Ehb, he teams up with an unlikely band of allies with the goal of slaying the leader of the "Dark Ones". Fighting against all odds, they must free the land from the grasp of the evil tyrant Raven and save the world.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Lawbolisted
2011/11/03

Powerful

More
Kaelan Mccaffrey
2011/11/04

Like the great film, it's made with a great deal of visible affection both in front of and behind the camera.

More
Marva
2011/11/05

It is an exhilarating, distressing, funny and profound film, with one of the more memorable film scores in years,

More
Geraldine
2011/11/06

The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

More
Platypuschow
2011/11/07

Uwe Boll is the stuff of legends, he's a director so detested that he's become one of those things that is trendy to hate. People slate him and rate his movies without even seeing them and I find that a damn shame.The trouble with Boll is he doesn't have a style, you watch a Bruckheimer/Bay/Spielberg/Nolan etc film you can tell it's one of theres whereas Boll has no identity beyond his love of adapting video games.I personally don't think the hatred is justified, yes he's done some stinkers and yes the man himself is a lunatic but he has done some very enjoyable films as well. In The Name Of The King (2007) wasn't one of them, but it was passable. This sequel however is a cliched mess.It was doomed from the outset, Lungren turned the roll down and only later changed his mind due to his divorce and financial situation. So immediatly you have a leading man who doesn't want to be there, and was vocal about this fact.To make matters worse Lungren injured himself on the first day of filming, this is evident throughout the movie as he is barely mobile and has a nasty limp.The film itself is a highly cliched tale involving a man who is dragged through time and forced to fullfill a prophecy. Yeah, exactly.The Good:Natalie Burn & Aleks PaunovicCGI is better than expectedThe Bad:Script is poorStupidly clichedLungrens injury is blatantThings I Learnt From This Movie:Every fantasy movie needs a black forest from which no man has ever made out alive!

More
Wizard-8
2011/11/08

While I wouldn't call "In the Name of the King: Two Worlds" the worst movie I've seen from the notorious Uwe Boll, it is (to date) the DULLEST movie I've seen from him. Watching it, I didn't sense any enthusiasm, either from the cast (including Dolph Lundgren, who is usually a fun B movie actor) or from behind the camera. This may be because the script is both highly predictable and filled with far more talk than action. The limited action, by the way, is poorly constructed, with rapid editing and lame choreography. The film also looks quite cheap, with most of the budget apparently blown on the costumes, with little else for sets and special effects. Two points of merit can be found in the movie, however. The filmed in British Columbian wilderness backdrop does look nice at times, and the movie gets points for making its central protagonist Canadian (something you seldom see in fantasy films).

More
Valin73
2011/11/09

The only thing I enjoyed about this movie was ....The Cover... It has Dolph in a suit of armour and a nice fortress that was not seen in the movie.....But they did have in the 43rd minute.....(As the guards close the fortress doors and the camera pans out...in between the right side of the fortress and that big tree.....you'll see an Automobile, 4 door I think.... lol)And what was that camera shot with the king setting his wig at the beginning. I thought that it would be significant later on in the movie...but No..Nope!! definitely not a keeper

More
xxx_plissit
2011/11/10

Jesus Christ, Really?? except for having at least one recognizable actor this film seems a lot like a straight to video lionsgate film. This is basically Blacknight(Martin Lawrence) with a little violence. Dolph has made his fair share of straight to video movies but this one is a special kind of suck. Dolph obviously is not keeping himself in shape either. This shows by the way he basically limps every time he walk or attempts to run. I'm thinking he and Steven Segall have the same agent because they both are totally out of shape but yet keep making bullshit straight to video or USA channel movies. Get back into shape you if you are going to make action films you jerks.

More