Below Her Mouth (2017)

You won't be disappointed!

This is a coming of age storyline that you've seen in one form or another for decades. It takes a truly unique voice to make yet another one worth watching.

The film may be flawed, but its message is not.

An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

There was no relationship development at all. This was just like a porno and it was so boring. There was more sex in it then words.

Okay so this film upholds structures that perpetuate rape-culture and misogyny, the "lesbian predator" and "chronic bisexual cheater" tropes are incredibly problematic and furthermore have been worn out since 2004, the overall lack of depth to the characters and dialogue topped off with the fact that nothing, and I mean NOTHING of actual genuine interest happens during the 94 minutes of this just sums up this really lousy film

I enjoyed this movie despite the rather bland performance of Erika Linder. Taking into account this was her first film, I can give her break in that regard especially since she performed so well in the lovemaking scenes(Not much talking there,I suppose). But the true show -stealer was Natalie Krill. She was very convincing in her portrayal of a woman fighting her feelings and desires for another woman while engaged to a man but losing the battle bit by bit. A very beautiful and versatile actress is Natalie and one that I will look forward to seeing more of. The movie itself could've been better I believe had there been more effort given in portraying Dallas as a protagonist. Part of me wanted to see her fall in love and find happiness while another part didn't think she truly deserved it because of her insensitivity.Very much like Shane McCutcheon as the previous reviewer stated.

As a straight woman I've wondered what the appeal is in a woman who acts like a man? The answer would seem to be that hopefully the more positive qualities that women often have, e.g., sensitivity, awareness of another's feelings, willingness to talk and discuss, would still be there despite the more masculine appearance and personality. In this film, I questioned what was it that attracted Jasmine to Dallas and the answer kept being that Dallas treated her like a princess. Jasmine appeared to "love" Dallas because of Dallas's seeming worship of her. That, and perhaps the greater knowledge of how to treat a woman sexually that lesbians tend to have. So ultimately this was a film about two self-centered characters getting off on each other's ability to feed their respective egos. Another question was again in Dallas's character, she was all about sexually pleasing whatever woman she was with, yet they didn't do the same for her. So naturally, she seemed doomed to wind up feeling unhappy, deprived and somewhat like a martyr. We did see her going down on Jasmine but not the reverse, which also implied the question of whether Jasmine was even into Dallas's body? Ultimately, I have to agree with the other reviewers who said this film was short on plot and big on soft-core eroticism. A couple of questions were raised but there's not enough depth for them to be answered.