Home > Adventure >

Foodfight!

Foodfight! (2012)

June. 15,2012
|
1.3
|
PG
| Adventure Animation Action Comedy

The evil Brand X joins a supermarket that becomes a city after closing time.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Lucybespro
2012/06/15

It is a performances centric movie

More
UnowPriceless
2012/06/16

hyped garbage

More
FirstWitch
2012/06/17

A movie that not only functions as a solid scarefest but a razor-sharp satire.

More
Abbigail Bush
2012/06/18

what a terribly boring film. I'm sorry but this is absolutely not deserving of best picture and will be forgotten quickly. Entertaining and engaging cinema? No. Nothing performances with flat faces and mistaking silence for subtlety.

More
nb-87458
2012/06/19

Never seen anything better than this before. I honestly hope it gets a great rating.

More
connorasivill
2012/06/20

This movie is amazing . i love it so much my wife hates me and my parents disown me

More
loose_ends
2012/06/21

I started watching this out of morbid curiosity and did not expect to last more than five minutes. But for some reason the train wreck effect took over, and I ended up watching all 90 minutes. Most of the discussion of this film is from people who have never seen it, so it was interesting to see the actual film.Firstly, much to my surprise, the film fails on its basic premise. Though much drama has been made about it being a "feature-length advertisement," the money spent to get the rights for real brand mascots was totally wasted. Brand mascots in the film are called "ikes" (short for icons), though that's never properly introduced (it just randomly starts happening partway through), and it doesn't sound right to me, so I'll just say "mascots." Well, mascots like Mr. Clean or Mrs. Butterworth might show up here or there, but their role in the film is so small they could be removed with no loss. Most of the film is spent focusing on original character mascots for fictional products.And even then, the premise still fails. Dex Dogtective, the lead character, is supposed to be a mascot for a cereal brand, but that's alluded to once at the beginning and never mentioned again. For some characters, such as the grotesque Cheazel T. Weasel, it's never mentioned what brand they're supposed to represent, and it's hard to imagine anyone would want to buy a product with him emblazoned on it. While the "brains" behind this film, Lawrence Kasanoff, cited Toy Story as his inspiration, he seems to have missed what made Toy Story effective. The story rests on the concept that our toys have feelings, and are conscious of the fact that, to us, they are merely toys. They still live and interact in the human world. The brand mascots in this world might as well be generic anthropomorphic animals, because apart from labeling themselves as such, their jobs as mascots have no effect on them. Even the world of the "ikes" doesn't resemble a grocery store in most scenes. They live a generic-looking city, which would never exist inside a grocery store, and does not resemble the same store during daytime hours.As the above implies, the characterization is lazy at best. Dog Dextective has two outfits: one Indiana Jones-esque uniform and one tuxedo that looks like something out of Film Noir. He switches between these two depending on if it's an action scene or a serious one. That seems to be the only attempt to give him personality; otherwise he's the generic male hero who's awesome because everyone says he is. His friend Daredevil Dan, the comic relief, is a chocolate squirrel voiced by Dwayne Brady. This character embodies so many racist stereotypes it's difficult to see how it was greenlit in the early 2000s. Most films do not do justice to female characters, but the lead two in this one are particularly bad. In history's most blatant invocation of the virgin/whore dichotomy, we have Sunshine Goodness (played by a 15-year-old Hilary Duff), who is so sickly-sweet and innocent, she is basically a child. Then we have Lady X, played by Eva Longoria, who parades around in fetish wear with come-hither eyes as she tries to seduce Dex. The fact that a 15-year-old was cast to play the primary love interest of 37-year-old Charlie Sheen only adds to the grossness of it all.And then there's the plot. I never expected the sheer weirdness of it. At first the concept seems simple enough: a nefarious man named Mr. Clipboard is trying to take over the store with his brand called Brand X, and the "ikes" need to get together and stop him. But before we know it, the Brand X mascots turn into literal Nazis, complete with gas chambers and German accents, and try to commit genocide against the other brands. Lady X parades around in her fetish wear and takes on the role of Hitler. This culminates in the titular "foodfight"--at which point we remember this is actually supposed to take place in a grocery store, as opposed to being some weird Nazi/cartoon animal/erotica film.As barely needs to be said, the writing is awful. It's crass and unfunny, with plenty of lines that should never have made their way into a children's film. Sometimes it seems like the writers sat around brainstorming as many grocery-related sexual puns as possible and inserted them at random. And of course there is rampant scatological humor.Then there's the animation. Plenty has been said about it, and yes, it's bad. That being said, the character animation is by far the worst. The blurry backgrounds and Playstation 1-style textures can be ignored after a while, but the creepy, jerky, and absurd-looking movements by the characters are like a slap in the face every time. The dancing scene between Dex and Lady X is particularly ridiculous. The characters are also eternally locked in the same facial expression (with rare exceptions).While it's often discussed how the original hard drives for this film were stolen, and the final redone version is cheap and unfinished, I have a hard time believing the original film was much better. The trailer shows scenes note-by-note in this version, and the voice actors' lines were already recorded. It's flawed in pretty much every way, and would need a complete overhaul to be palatable.

More
iversen323
2012/06/22

I would recommend this to absolutely no one, and would love it if I could go back so I wouldn't have watched it. Nothing about this movie is redeeming. If you think it's a good bad like 'The Room', it's just flat bad. Horrible voice acting, atrocious CGI, plot hard to follow, and the climax lasted 30 minutes which was the same thing for that time, painful on the eyes, and writing written by a kindergarten student. This is only good if you turn away and run for the hills. Only watch if you truly want to loose faith in the world.

More