Wild Things 2 (2004)

So much average

Simple and well acted, it has tension enough to knot the stomach.

This story has more twists and turns than a second-rate soap opera.

The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.

Why this movie was made in first place ? The original was hardly a classic. Most people were watching it for the sex scenes. Including me. OK , so it had decent acting . Nice music . Overall , it wasn't bad . But sequel ? Really ?Here we have a movie that not just follows the formula of first movie , but actually is a remake. They only changed actors and small details. Talk about lazy movie making… There really isn't any point for watching this. The sex scene is good , I admit. Unfortunately , even that element is weaker compared to the threesome in "Wild things".Better watch the original. Or "Basic instinct" . Or "Body heat". I give it 1/10.

this followup to the original Wildthings falls short in a lot of ares.it is nearly a carbon copy of the original plot structure.basically people betraying each other and being betrayed by others.however,there is no originality in this movie.the basic story has been done and much effectively in the original.there are a lot of twists and turns in this one,but they are very predictable,although ridiculous at time.the acting,while decent in the original,is less than decent in this movie.this is unfortunate,because the story itself is not good enough to carry the movie.you may find your eyelids drooping while watching this thing,as it is painfully slow at times.and you're eyes will glaze over and roll back in your head at the absurdity of the plot twists.i believe many of these plot twists were simply added to keep the movie at a certain running time.this movie is a much less than average effort 3* out of 10

This movie is exactly like the first Wild Things, a scam + a threesome (FFM) + murder + corruption. The only differences are that there was more nudity, the acting wasn't as good, and there were more characters involved in the movie. If you've seen the 1st Wild Things, there's no reason to watch this movie- they have the same chain of events (more or less). If you haven't seen the 1st Wild Things, there's still no reason to watch this movie, unless you only want to see hot girls frolic in a pointless movie, then by all means watch it. If you're looking for pornography, look elsewhere. They remain clothed from the waist down. If you're looking for a real chain of events, watch the first movie. I personally think it was better at surprising the audience than the second movie.

The original Wild Things is a decent movie...kind of a guilty pleasure of mine. I was hoping this would be the same.Wrong, wrong, wrong!!! First of all, the plot was weak, at best. Secondly, the twists were lame. I watched it with my best friend and at one point she turned to me and jokingly suggested a ludicrous ending.Imagine our surprise and disbelief when that WAS the real ending.Wild Things 2 lacks the sensuality, the intelligence, and the imagination of the original. It is predictable, and boring. The sex scenes are lack luster and have no passion to them.All through this movie I kept thinking that I need to know what happens, but I can't wait for this movie to end! I was feeling generous tonight, so it gets a 3/10 but probably deserves a 2.