Home > Drama >

Hard Candy

Watch Now

Hard Candy (2005)

January. 14,2005
|
7
|
R
| Drama Thriller
Watch Now

Hayley’s a smart, charming teenage girl. Jeff’s a handsome, smooth fashion photographer. An Internet chat, a coffee shop meet-up, an impromptu fashion shoot back at Jeff’s place. Jeff thinks it’s his lucky night. He’s in for a surprise.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Grimerlana
2005/01/14

Plenty to Like, Plenty to Dislike

More
Odelecol
2005/01/15

Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.

More
FirstWitch
2005/01/16

A movie that not only functions as a solid scarefest but a razor-sharp satire.

More
Myron Clemons
2005/01/17

A film of deceptively outspoken contemporary relevance, this is cinema at its most alert, alarming and alive.

More
crystallogic
2005/01/18

Well now, the profusion of low scores for this title I'm seeing on IMDB are interesting. Some of the reviews themselves are rather revealing, too. I don't blame most of my fellows; I couldn't really give this a higher score even though a part of me wanted to, but on the whole I'm very glad I watched this film and as a work of art that puts the viewer in the position of being the "victim" of a kind of sociological experiment, I think it's an admirable success.A mistake I think many people make when viewing film is to try to ascribe a message to it: a moral you can sum up in a sentence, a payload or political polemic. It's not that people necessarily want to see this in the films they watch, but they can't help but do this sometimes, and oftentime the result of their conclusions leaves viewers feeling angry and manipulated.Make no mistake, then, this film is manipulative. I ask, though, why shouldn't it be? Furthermore, although it's manipulative in a rather extreme, even heavy-handed way, I don't think it's trying to deliver a message to the viewer in a neat little box with a bow. What I believe it is doing is presenting a situation which, after all, is not all that uncommon in the annals of recent human history, and turning it on its head; asking us to examine it from several different angles and perspectives which we might not have considered. So, the one criticism I really have of this film is unfortunately the same one that everybody else who actually liked it (that is, those that aren't utterly convinced that it's trying to shove a feminist message down their throats) have: I don't see how haley was able to do some of the things she apparently did in this movie. The precociousness and intelligence, I can buy, but the physical strength is a bit more of a stretch. Interestingly, every time jeff gets poleaxed and comes to, haley has done something else rather incredible with his body. How does she manage it? jeff must be twice her weight and size. Even if she bench presses that kind of weight regularly, managing to manoeuvre him into a chair, get off his clothes, suffocate him unconscious with cling wrap (in reality I suspect he would have been fighting really hard and it would have taken several minutes to accomplish this, though I suppose he could have been already weakened by being drugged earlier), suspend him from the ceiling -- all that stuff stretches credibility to its breaking point. In spite of having no difficulty accepting her intelligence, too, I did find at a couple of points that I was listening to an older woman speak, and not a fourteen-year-old-girl. This is particularly evident when she is reprimanding jeff for allowing her to drink and accepting her flirtations. I"ts so easy to blame a kid!", she says. "If a kid says, 'hey, let's make screwdrivers!', you take the alcohol away!" I couldn't help but feel this was the screen-writer pointing the finger and not a "kid" talking at all, though Ellen page delivered the whole scene with a lot of feeling and intensity.As for her incredible physical feats, hey, maybe she had an accomplice we didn't even see? We always get those scenes from Jeff's perspective, right, so, you never know! I'm only being half-serious, but the last-moment revelation at the end that jeff in fact had an accomplice and they were responsible for the missing/dead girl together could make for a nice comparison.The lack of other characters in the movie didn't really bother me, though, despite that last-moment reveal of a person of great significance whom we never even heard of up til that point. This after all isn't the point of the film, and in the end I admire it's sheer dedication to minimalism. This could have been a stage play, easily. And some of my favourite productions are two-handers in minimal sets, so this one fits right in. At 100 minutes though, it is perhaps just a little too lenghty, or maybe I would have spent some of that extra time in greater build-up before the two characters met, or background, or maybe even a phone call or two between jeff and Aaron to establish that they had some kind of relationship so it didn't come so much out of left-field. Still, I think it entirely possible that things like that would have taken away from the direct, what-you-see-is-what-you-get nature of the film, and that is in the end one of its most admirable qualities.The other thing to really admire in the film are the performances, which are both top-class in their own right. haley is adorable and, during those moments when we still feel jeff might be innocent, it's easy to see how he could be taken in fully and fighting with himself to stay away from this dangerously precocious and sexually awakened youngster. Jeff himself is put through the wringer of emotions and displays a wide range, but mostly he just comes across as a rather normal, low-key guy in his early thirties, the type whom you wouldn't think twice about meeting on the street. That's part of the genius of it. He has an explanation for everything; he has no harmful urges, he's just a photographer!In the end, I don't think this movie comes down firmly on haley's side any more than it really does on Jeff's. I could wish that we knew a little more about her, because I don't think the role of badass vigilante entirely suits, but I'm ok with a bit of obscurity and appreciate that the filmmakers didn't want to get bogged down in backstory and unnecessary complexities. This is a "what if?" movie, and thus I think it's advisable to suspend disblief at some of its more incredible elements and allow the thought experiment to proceed. The thought experiment in question asks you to imagine "what if this often all-too-real and tragic situation happened this way instead?" "What if the child got the upper hand? What if the child in question had her own particular kind of psychopathy to contend with?" It's interesting, and timely, and although I have some reservations, I'm glad it was made.

More
mads leonard holvik
2005/01/19

This movie somehow preaches evil onto others, maybe torturing people to admit things they didn't do and then kill them. Never have I seen a movie where I wanted someone to die so badly. The whole thing made me sick. I do not know what the moral here is, but if someone gets a kick out of watching this, I feel sorry for them.

More
muomo
2005/01/20

It has a somewhat promising start, but the dwindle down into sadistic torture happened too quickly and without enough exposition to justify it. Essentially, it ends up just looking like To Catch a Predator but instead of the cops being called, the predator is castrated immediately. There is simply not enough information given to make you hate what you are told to think is a sick pedophile, nor is there enough information to make you feel that Hayley is justified in her actions. The ending was just weird, and I still don't quite get why Janelle was even a thing.This movie was NOT thrilling and the castration scene was weak. I didn't need to see the castration play-by-play, but there are plenty of ways to make a gruesome scene still seem gruesome even if it occurs off-screen. The girl is also stupid and should've done something to ensure that he could not move. As tiny as she was, if he was able to get the upper-hand for even a second, that would've been the end for her.I also don't get why Sandra Oh's name is presented like she was relevant. She was on screen for a grand total of 5 minutes.

More
Ali Davari
2005/01/21

First of all it's just not a big-one-script at all so if you attend to forget about the technical directing thing and stick to the plot so you can enjoy it, You get disappointed. The worst is the "form" of it which included directing, filming, sound, etc. All these unprofessional camera angles and close shots and add those coloring and filters which helping of course to transfer the atmosphere but yet completely unnecessary or, could have done it in a better way, and weak sound effects and soundtrack that sometimes in the movie you feel the lack of it, All gathered to give you a bad experience you could have on a movie. Don't wanna talk about the plot, it already has been explained in the plot twist! and that's all. If it doesn't motivate you enough to watch it and look for a better directing in this, well you get nothing.

More