The Royal Tenenbaums (2001)

The Worst Film Ever

Plenty to Like, Plenty to Dislike

As Good As It Gets

It's funny, it's tense, it features two great performances from two actors and the director expertly creates a web of odd tension where you actually don't know what is happening for the majority of the run time.

There are many directors that become famous for trademarks or gimmicks inserted into their films. Whether it be Hitchcock appearing in his own films or M. Night Shyamalan (attempting to) having a plot twist ending, some work and some are cheap.What we have with Wes Anderson is an off-beat tone that has drawn people to either love or hate him. Before I talk about the tone and mood of his films, what is further key is his visual style. Never before have I seen such attentiveness and perfectionism put into symmetry and bursting colors. You'll have a dinner table with equal amount of characters with one lamp on either side of the room and a bright red wall. The camera is then placed (movement is used more for pans-- and even with these the pans are symmetrical) specifically to draw the audience to the center of the screen while noticing that on either side will be similarities. The messages may be more subtle in what they represent, but the popping sets are exquisitely memorable and truly some eye-candy.I think that when some people will watch an Anderson movie, there could be an uneasiness or tenseness by not knowing if what you should do is laugh or walk out of the room before it's too late. And there are the dissenters that are perhaps expecting more traditionalist filming. If you don't know what you're getting into with one of these films, then I would recommend being a little hesitant. It's not for everybody.With that said, The Royal Tenenbaums begins with one of the best montages I have ever seen. It's Wes Anderson being himself while setting up the characters that truly need an introduction because they belong in this mad wonderland. You have Gene Hackman, the Wilson brothers, Gwyneth Paltrow, Ben Stiller, and of course Bill Murray. I'm not even sure where I would begin to describe these characters that are associated in one way or the other with the Tenenbaum family-- but as a start, Hackman is the father that has mainly neglected his family and attempts to have everyone reconnect and have more bonding time in a once blooming family.The middle of the film may be bogged down slightly with less exciting scenes, but from Anderson and Owen Wilson's writing, these otherwise mundanely watchable scenes are elevated by the captivating, dysfunctional characters (Gwyneth Paltrow's deadbeat Margot Tenenbaum may be my favorite) that provide unconventional unpredictability. I'm not even sure if unconventional unpredictability is a term that even makes sense, but all the more does it describe Wes Anderson.If you're still not sure what type of film this is, imagine a more modern setting with characters that don't belong but are trying to make it all work; the familial conflict is there, but boy did I have some laughs while watching it unfold. I have also seen Rushmore and Moonrise Kingdom, but The Royal Tenenbaums is both better as a film and as a starting point to understand whether you should watch more of these films. I was won over and enjoyed the movie thoroughly, but I still caution that the style may be off-putting for some.You can find this review and dozens of others at gillipediamoviereviews.blogspot.com

I've heard about this film and finally got a chance to get it on DVD. It's an interesting story and well acted,, but I simply can't get past the weird direction. It's like it was shot in the 60's or something. Zooming in?? What is this? Amateur hour? Seriously,, zooming in died out in the early 70's when they realized how ridiculous it looks. Also the narration was horrible. Like a documentary from the 60's. Really bad. Also the ridiculous printed titles - telling you what you were looking for and it was done in BIG BLOCK letters like the 60's. Not sure if this is intentional but I don't think it worked at all. This movie reminded me a lot of Stanly Kubrik's "Barry Lydon'.. too much like it. The cheesy narration, just drove me nuts.

By far and away this is the best Wes Anderson movie, and probably the best performance of Gene Hackman's career. The subtle dramatic relationships behind the typical quirky Anderson fare separate this one from his other films. It is quirky but grounded and the relationships feel real even if the characters are heightened to unrealistic levels.

Is it even possible for me to not like a Wes Anderson movie? He makes me feel like Rashid Khan in Hindustani classical music: that there's still hope for Hollywood! 'The Royal Tenenbaums' is worth watching just for its visuals (which Anderson isn't?). But Wes is not a Bhansali - he doesn't just make eye candies. In fact, even his visual treat is in a different league altogether. Blended with the narrative, it gives the feel of reading a rich novel and imagining it visually myself. There's a lot of creative imagination behind it. As a writer-director Anderson's movies are humanistic-existential. Relations are dealt with adroitly and you get more than a glimpse into the recesses of his character's minds. The Royal Tenenbaums has plenty of family drama, but if you go looking just for that, you'd be underwhelmed. See it for the presentation, and you'd be satisfied, if not delighted. Anderson weaves the bright and the dark just like real life does. Wes's films may never break the box offices, but his style will be loved and studied by connoisseurs for decades to come. 'The Royal Tenenbaums' is where he broke through into the commercial mainstream, but has continued to maintain his own creative stream despite that. And that's why I can never rate him below 9/10.H