Home > Horror >

28 Weeks Later

Watch Now

28 Weeks Later (2007)

May. 11,2007
|
6.9
|
R
| Horror Thriller Science Fiction
Watch Now

The inhabitants of the British Isles have lost their battle against the onslaught of disease, as the deadly rage virus has killed every citizen there. Six months later, a group of Americans dare to set foot on the isles, convinced the danger has come and gone. But it soon becomes all too clear that the scourge continues to live, waiting to pounce on its next victims.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

CheerupSilver
2007/05/11

Very Cool!!!

More
Humaira Grant
2007/05/12

It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.

More
Zlatica
2007/05/13

One of the worst ways to make a cult movie is to set out to make a cult movie.

More
Roxie
2007/05/14

The thing I enjoyed most about the film is the fact that it doesn't shy away from being a super-sized-cliche;

More
TalkiesandJabberwocky
2007/05/15

28 Weeks Later - One of my favorite zombie (yes zombie, don't start with that "they're infected with a rage virus, not zombies b.s.) movies. A much bigger budget than the first (28 Days Later), this one packs the punches and really keeps you on the edge of your seat throughout. You don't HAVE to see the first to follow this one either, so dive right in!

More
Davis P
2007/05/16

I have not yet seen the first film, 28 days later, so I can't speak to that and how this sequel follows up to it. I can only speak as to how this film is and whether it was effective or not. Personally, I do think it's an effective film. It is meant to be fun, entertaining, and full of action. It is a popcorn flick for sure. With all that being said, the filmmakers did a pretty good job with it. The effects and visuals work well for the most part. The actors did a good job, Byrne and Renner in particular. The action sequences are overall well done, maybe a bit too shaky in a couple parts, but that wasn't a huge issue. After seeing this film, I'm now inspired to see 28 days later. I'd suggest this one if you're looking for a fun action-horror film. But beware.... if zombies and some goriness makes you shy away from watching something, then this one ain't for you. 8/10 for 28 weeks later.

More
mistoppi
2007/05/17

Did 28 Days Later need a sequel? Probably not, but I'm still glad we got one.The story in 28 Weeks Later is happening in significantly smaller area. In 28 Days Later the main characters travel a lot while in this one the characters mostly stay in London, and especially that small, secured area in London. The more confined milieu gives the story something more, since the virus and the infected aren't really a thread somewhere outside, but it's inside, among you. And it creates even more chaos when the US soldiers are trying to control the situation. It's brilliant and agonising.While all of the movie is very good, one of the most effective moments is at the beginning of the film, when Don (Robert Carlyle) runs when the infected attack his wife. Another friend of mine had seen the movie and described it to me when we were younger, when I was about 11 or 12. And I still remember the way she described it and how impressive, maybe even awesome that scene was. You're used to seeing people being heroes in movies, and that was the opposite. Even if we may not really experience Don's fear in that scene, his actions are incredibly powerful. Also the shaky camera, quick and fast shots at the beginning were a bit worrisome. I was afraid that's what most of the movie was going to be like, because it just kept going on and on. It's effective, but also makes everything really hard to follow. Yet you could see the most important things. The only thing I like less about this movie is how American it seems. Of course it takes place in UK, and Juan Carlos Fresnadillo is a Spanish director, so it's not the movie itself. It's mostly how the US army is involved in securing London, letting people back in London. It's annoying, but also it seems really typical. It's annoying because you know that's exactly how it would go.28 Days Later doesn't necessarily need a sequel. 28 Weeks Later is different, and a certain touch is missing with Danny Boyle, but Juan Carlos Fresnadillo has made something haunting and amazing. You don't need to see it, since the story is different, but it's still absolutely worth your time.

More
mxpappy
2007/05/18

This movie had it all for me. Story, action, violence, tension, suspense. I was entertained from start to finish which is something very few movies due for me now a days. The first movie (28 days later) had an amazing story, and while this one lacks the story a little more than that of the first, everything is made up by just the overall action packed entertainment in this film and all the characters did a great job with their given rolls in the movie. **This movie is violent!! The eye-gouge scene in particular is hard scene to watch so I'd recommend this movie to only hardcore horror fans who are used to that kind of stuff.**I would recommend this movie to any horror fan looking for a suspenseful thrill ride. I can only hope there is a "28 months later"

More